Is Action-space (authority, capabilities) legally binding?

Q: Is Action-space (authority, capabilities) legally binding?

Action-space (authority, capabilities) is guidance in Singapore. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it. Range of actions the agent is permitted to take, determined by the tools it is allowed to use and transactions it can execute; spans sandboxes, internal systems and external systems, and read vs write actions.

ConceptGuidance

Action-space (authority, capabilities)

Is this legally binding?

Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.

Range of actions the agent is permitted to take, determined by the tools it is allowed to use and transactions it can execute; spans sandboxes, internal systems and external systems, and read vs write actions.

From the source
“Action-space (or authority, capabilities): Range of actions the agent is permitted to take”
Section 1.1.3, pp.4-5

imda.gov.sg Show it on the map

What this connects to

3 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.

Operationalises1

SectionDimension 1: Assess and bound the risks upfrontGuidance

Operationalised by1

ConceptComputer use agentGuidance

Cited by1

ObligationBound risks through agent limitsGuidance
Agent limits bound action-space (tools, systems, read/write)

Verified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.