Your people are already using AI. Can you prove they know how?
Someone will ask: a regulator, a customer’s security questionnaire, an insurer, or your own board. In the EU the question has a deadline, because Article 4 of the AI Act has required measures supporting staff AI literacy since February 2, 2025 and has been enforceable since August 2, 2026. In the United States it arrives through procurement, state AI laws and the Department of Labor’s AI literacy framework. The training is the easy part. The evidence is what you will be asked for.
Open a sample credential and ask it what the person can do. The answers come only from the topics that person passed, with the score and their own explanation behind each one, and the record is signed so nobody can edit it. This is the exact tool your procurement, compliance or security team gets when an employee hands them a link.
Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations
144 topics, self paced. Built against EU AI Act Article 4, with a pass gate on every topic and a verifiable evidence record per employee.
$49 Per person. Team seats $45 per seat from 3 seats, $39 at 50.
A free account, no card, and you are reading real lessons within a minute. If you enroll and change your mind there is a 7-day refund.
What doing nothing costs
Article 4 has applied since February 2, 2025. It is not a future project. Since August 2, 2026 national authorities have held the enforcement power to ask you about it.
There is no federal AI literacy mandate. What there is: a growing patchwork of state AI laws, the Department of Labor's AI literacy framework setting out what good workforce training looks like, and customers who now ask about staff AI training in the same questionnaire that asks about your backups. Nobody sends a notice first.
A completion certificate proves someone sat through a video. The obligation, as rewritten by the Digital Omnibus in July 2026, is to take measures supporting the AI literacy of the people operating your AI systems, and measures you cannot evidence are measures you cannot show you took.
When a regulator, a customer's security questionnaire, or your own board asks what your people actually know, somebody has to produce a file. Usually that person is you.
Dates verified July 22, 2026 against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and the Digital Omnibus. The high risk obligations moved to December 2, 2027 and August 2, 2028; the literacy duty did not move. See what changed and what did not.
What a defensible program looks like
Whoever you buy from, these are the properties that survive a question from a regulator, a client, or your own board. Use them as your checklist.
- Role aware training, because the duty scales with what a person actually does with AI, not with their job title.
- A pass gate per topic, so completion means demonstrated understanding rather than time on page.
- Applied judgment, not recall: people are asked what they would do in a real situation and are scored against a rubric.
- A per person record you can export on the day you are asked, showing what was covered, when, and how it was proven.
- Content that changes when the law changes, with the date of verification on the page.
GAGE was built to that checklist. The credential is the part most training does not have: a signed, verifiable record of what a specific person proved, that an employer or auditor can open and interrogate rather than take on faith.
Check it yourself before you talk to anyone
Open the sample, ask it a question in plain English, and read an answer drawn only from what that person passed. Two minutes, no account, nothing to install.
Verify a sample →Open the first module of the program and use the professor. It refuses to do graded work for a learner, which is the whole point.
Open the free preview →How the program maps to EU AI Act Article 4 and the US DOL AI Literacy Framework, with the official sources named and dated.
See the mapping →The 50-state AI law atlas: what has passed, what is pending and what lands on an employer, state by state, with every entry sourced and dated.
Open the atlas →Sixty checkpoints across the five content areas and seven delivery principles of the Department of Labor's AI literacy framework. It measures alignment, never compliance, and the gap report is instant and free.
Run the free check →The published yardstick we hold our own content to, so you can check the practice against the promise.
Read the standard →Seven properties credible evidence of AI capability must have, each with the test to apply, what fails it, and where our own record still falls short.
Read the framework →Start small, on purpose
Nobody should roll a program out to a whole company on a promise. Put a handful of people through the free preview first, including your most skeptical one. They will tell you within an hour whether the teaching is real, whether the gates are honest, and whether the credential is something you would show a client.
Team seats and enterprise terms are published. See pricing. Checkout is live: teams buy seats online and get a code to share, and enterprise rollouts are quoted directly.
Talk to the person who built it
I am Frank Carrasco. I built this program, I verify the regulatory claims on this site myself, and I answer the phone. If you want to know whether GAGE fits your company, ask me directly and I will tell you plainly, including when the answer is no.
Not ready yet?
Get the short brief when the enforcement position changes. We send the verified version, with sources, and nothing else.