Built, and opening soon
Certified China AI Regulatory Professional (CCARP)
China ships more binding AI rules than anyone, and every company that touches the Chinese market must comply with them.
After completing this program, you will be able to:
The Filing Labs
A mock algorithm filing and a GenAI compliance audit, practiced end to end. The real work of China AI compliance, not a survey of it.
Who this is for
You inherited China compliance; Module 9's tri-jurisdiction playbook plus the filing mechanics are your fast path.
Chinese AI systems run through your supply chain; the full stack, from algorithm filings to incident response, is your job description.
Your company touches the Chinese market; the comparative modules translate obligations into your existing frameworks.
There is no comparable English-language certification; this is the credential your clients cannot find elsewhere.
Curriculum · 11 modules
- Why China's AI Rules Reach You
- Quick Win: Determine a Real Filing Obligation
- The Seven Layers of Chinese AI Regulation: Your Map to the Source Material
- China's Legal Hierarchy for AI
- The Core Triad: CSL, PIPL, DSL
- Regulators and Jurisdictions
- The AI Regulatory Stack
- National Standards: TC260 and the GB System
- Local Rules and Pilot Zones
- The AI Law Signal and the Legislative Roadmap
- Regulatory Mapping Exercise
- Filing Threshold Analysis
- The CAC Algorithm Registry
- Filing Documentation Requirements
- Security Self-Assessment Methodology
- Filing Timelines and Amendments
- Filing Recommendation Algorithms
- Filing Deep Synthesis Services
- Lab: Mock Algorithm Filing
- GenAI Interim Measures, Article by Article
- Service Provider Obligations
- Security Assessment Requirements
- Training Data Compliance
- Content Moderation Frameworks
- User Rights and Transparency
- Internal Use vs Regulated Service
- Cross-Border GenAI Services
- Training Data Security Standards
- Lab: GenAI Compliance Audit
- The Labeling Measures Framework
- Explicit Labels
- Implicit Labels: Metadata and Watermarks
- Platform-Specific Implementation
- The Content Distribution Chain
- Technical Implementation of Labeling
- Mixed Human and AI Content
- Labeling Compliance Audits
- Data Classification for AI
- Training Data Acquisition
- Cross-Border Transfer Mechanisms
- Data Localization
- Privacy Impact Assessments for AI
- AI Data Security Standards
- Managing AI Vendors and Processors
- Data Breach Response for AI
- China's AI Ethics Landscape
- The 2026 AI Ethics Review Measures
- Building an Ethics Committee
- High-Risk AI Classification
- Ethics Review Procedures
- Sensitive Areas and Special Scrutiny
- Bias Assessment and Mitigation
- Lab: Ethics Review Simulation
- AI in Financial Services
- AI in Healthcare and Life Sciences
- Autonomous Vehicles and Transportation
- AI in Education Technology
- Industrial and Manufacturing AI
- AI in Media and Entertainment
- AI in E-Commerce and Retail
- Cross-Sector Integration Exercise
- Enforcement Authorities and Powers
- The Penalty Framework
- Enforcement Patterns, 2024 to 2026
- Cybersecurity Incident Reporting
- GenAI Security Incident Response
- Managing the Regulator Relationship
- Crisis Communication
- Lab: Incident Response Drill
- China vs the EU AI Act: Mapping the GenAI Measures Against Europe's GPAI Regime
- The US Federal and State Landscape
- Three Regulatory Paradigms
- Overlapping Obligations
- Conflicting Requirements
- Global AI Governance Initiatives
- Multinational Compliance Architecture
- The Board Briefing
- Capstone Overview and Your Target Organization
- Choosing Your Market Position
- Regulatory Gap Analysis
- Mock Filing Package
- Implementation Roadmap
- Governance Framework Design
- The Executive Presentation
- Defending Your Compliance Program
Every topic listed here is built and written. The program opens soon, and nothing above can be started or bought before then.
How mastery is proven
Completion is not the bar here. Every claim on your credential is earned through assessment, and your final Mastery Score is built from two halves. The first half is where the teach-back lives.
Every topic ends two ways: a server-graded check (pass at 80% or the next topic stays gated) and a teach-back, where you explain the lesson in your own words and it is graded against the lesson itself on four dimensions. A topic’s score is the average of the two, and the running average across topics is half of your Mastery Score.
Finish every topic and face the summit: a timed, open book final exam of scenario judgment (open book on purpose: we test judgment, not memory), or a rubric-graded capstone project you actually build.
Your credential lives at a permanent signed URL. Employers scan it, see every verified competency with real scores, and can ask it questions grounded in what you actually passed.
Scenario responses are graded on four dimensions no multiple-choice exam can measure:
One focused 30-minute session per topic on the required path. The depth (full read, audio, slides, infographic, prompts) is there when you want it, never forced.
Your passed explanations become part of your credential. An employer who scans it can read how you explained each topic, in your words, if you choose to share them. You own your work and the dossier is off until you turn it on.
9 Content Formats Per Topic
Every topic delivers knowledge through multiple modalities for deeper retention.
Built sourced, shipped verified
Every topic is researched against real, cited sources, then scanned for gaps, bias, hallucination, and outdated material before it ships. Every review pass is logged with evidence, so the quality bar is verifiable, not a claim. The content you learn from has been pressure-tested before it reaches you.
The curriculum above is finished and every topic is named. It opens soon. Leave your email and we will tell you the day it does, and nothing else.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. The program adapts to your role: executive, technical, legal, clinical, or any other.
Every topic is researched against real sources and checked for gaps, bias, hallucination, and outdated material before it ships. When the rules move, the content moves with them.
A completion record with your assessment score. Pass every core topic and the program mastery exam to earn your signed GAGE credential: a living record anyone can verify in seconds by scanning its QR seal. Bonus tracks add visible evidence but never gate the credential.
Because the obligations follow the service, not the office. If your product reaches users in China, or your model was trained on data that came from there, or you sell through a Chinese partner, the filing and labeling duties can reach you. Module 0 has you determine a real filing obligation before anything else, so you find out early rather than late.
No, and it is not meant to. Module 9 maps China's regime against the EU AI Act and the US landscape so one compliance program can serve all three. Take this when China is in scope; take the EU AI Act program when you own that implementation.
Many certification bodies accept self-reported outside training: IAPP members, for example, can self-report relevant non-IAPP training at 1 CPE per hour of study, validated by proof of completion or an assessment, within 90 days of the activity. Your GAGE credential is built for exactly that kind of proof: it records the program and every mastery assessment you passed, with scores, at a link your certifying body can open. Check your own body's policy before relying on it.