Article 17: Quality management system
Is this legally binding?
Binding. Binding law. It applies to everyone in scope, whether or not anyone points at it.
Providers of high-risk AI systems must operate a documented quality management system ensuring regulatory compliance.
What this connects to
7 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Maps across to3
- External frameworkClause 5: LeadershipStandardGAGE analysis, not official
Provider QMS leadership duties align with AIMS leadership clause
- External frameworkClause 10: ImprovementStandardGAGE analysis, not official
QMS corrective processes align with AIMS improvement clause
- External frameworkFunction: GOVERNGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Provider QMS corresponds to GOVERN structures and policies
Mapped across from4
- SectionArea 1: Internal Governance Structures and MeasuresGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Internal governance measures anticipate the provider quality management system
- SectionPrinciple 6: Accountability and IntegrityGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Accountability structures anticipate provider QMS duties
- ObligationHigh-risk AI: pre-deployment assessment, registration, human oversightBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Pre-market conformity assessment for high-risk systems parallels EU provider QMS/conformity duties
- InstrumentConsultation Paper on Proposed Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence Risk Management for Financial Institutions (P017-2025)ConsultationGAGE analysis, not official
MAS proposals on FI governance parallel provider QMS expectations
Verified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.