Clause 4: Context of the organization
Is this legally binding?
Standard. A voluntary standard. It becomes an obligation the moment a contract or a regulator cites it.
Understanding the organisation and its context, needs and expectations of interested parties, AIMS scope, and the AI management system itself.
What this connects to
6 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Maps across to1
- External frameworkFunction: MAPGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Organisational context parallels MAP context establishment
Mapped across from5
- SectionArea 1: Internal Governance Structures and MeasuresGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
MGF2 internal governance maps to AIMS scoping and organisational context
- SectionFocus area 9: AI for Public GoodGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Public-good orientation shapes AIMS context and stakeholder expectations
- InstrumentSS ISO/IEC 42001:2024 - Information technology, Artificial intelligence, Management systemStandardGAGE analysis, not official
SS adoption includes Clause 4 unchanged
- External frameworkArticle 6 + Annex III: High-risk AI systemsBindingGAGE analysis, not official
High-risk classification determines AIMS context and scope
- InstrumentASEAN Responsible AI Roadmap (2025-2030)GuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Roadmap readiness assessment shapes national AIMS-context conditions
Verified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.