Clause 8: Operation
Is this legally binding?
Standard. A voluntary standard. It becomes an obligation the moment a contract or a regulator cites it.
Operational planning and control: AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment and lifecycle operation of AI systems.
What this connects to
17 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Maps across to1
- External frameworkFunction: MANAGEGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
AIMS operation corresponds to MANAGE risk treatment
Mapped across from16
- SectionArea 2: Determining the Level of Human Involvement in AI-augmented Decision-makingGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Determining human involvement is operationalised through AIMS operational controls
- SectionArea 3: Operations ManagementGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Operations management aligns with ISO 42001 operational planning and lifecycle control
- InstrumentModel AI Governance Framework for Generative AI (2024)GuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
GenAI MGF operational dimensions map to AIMS operational controls
- InstrumentCSA Guidelines and Companion Guide on Securing AI SystemsGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
CSA lifecycle-stage controls align with AIMS operational planning and control
- InstrumentPersonal Data Protection Act 2012 (No. 26 of 2012)BindingGAGE analysis, not official
PDPA-compliant data handling is part of AIMS operational control of AI systems
- SectionFocus area 3: Trusted Development and DeploymentGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Trusted development/deployment maps to AIMS operational control
- External frameworkArticle 9: Risk management systemBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Risk management execution maps to AIMS operational control
- External frameworkArticle 10: Data and data governanceBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Data governance for training data is exercised through AIMS operational controls
- External frameworkArticle 14: Human oversightBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Human oversight measures are implemented within AIMS operation
- External frameworkArticle 15: Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurityBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Accuracy/robustness/cybersecurity achieved via AIMS operational controls
- External frameworkArticle 26: Obligations of deployersBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Deployer obligations map to AIMS operational responsibilities
- SectionStage 5: End of LifeGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Secure disposal is part of AIMS lifecycle operation
- InstrumentSS ISO/IEC 42001:2024 - Information technology, Artificial intelligence, Management systemStandardGAGE analysis, not official
SS adoption includes Clause 8 unchanged
- ObligationHigh-risk AI: pre-deployment assessment, registration, human oversightBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Vietnam's high-risk operational controls parallel AIMS operational requirements
- ConceptSaaS agentic AI and shared responsibilityGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
SaaS vendor risk articulation belongs to AIMS third-party operational control
- SectionComponent: Determining the level of human involvementGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Human involvement determination is exercised in AIMS operation
Verified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.