Is Section 4: Commerce names the onerous state laws legally binding?

Q: Is Section 4: Commerce names the onerous state laws legally binding?

Section 4: Commerce names the onerous state laws is binding, sectoral in the United States. Binding, but only for a defined population: one regulated sector, or the federal government and the vendors it buys from. The Secretary of Commerce was to publish, within 90 days, an evaluation identifying state AI laws that conflict with the policy, with attention to laws that require models to alter truthful outputs. The deadline was 11 March 2026. As of this dataset's verification date no such list had been published.

SectionBinding, sectoral

Section 4: Commerce names the onerous state laws

Is this legally binding?

Binding, sectoral. Binding, but only for a defined population: one regulated sector, or the federal government and the vendors it buys from.

The Secretary of Commerce was to publish, within 90 days, an evaluation identifying state AI laws that conflict with the policy, with attention to laws that require models to alter truthful outputs. The deadline was 11 March 2026. As of this dataset's verification date no such list had been published.

From the source
“onerous laws that conflict with the policy”
EO 14365 section 4

federalregister.gov Show it on the map

What this connects to

2 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.

Part of1

InstrumentExecutive Order 14365: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial IntelligenceBinding, sectoral

Applies to1

ConceptWhere the binding AI obligations actually are: the statesBinding
The evaluation is of state laws; the Atlas is where those laws are

Verified against the official source on 2026-08-18. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.