Is Every agency identifies a Chief AI Officer legally binding?

Q: Is Every agency identifies a Chief AI Officer legally binding?

Every agency identifies a Chief AI Officer is binding, sectoral in the United States. Binding, but only for a defined population: one regulated sector, or the federal government and the vendors it buys from. Agencies must identify a Chief AI Officer to champion the agency's AI goals and advise on removing barriers. OMB convenes and chairs an interagency council of them.

ObligationBinding, sectoral

Every agency identifies a Chief AI Officer

Is this legally binding?

Binding, sectoral. Binding, but only for a defined population: one regulated sector, or the federal government and the vendors it buys from.

Agencies must identify a Chief AI Officer to champion the agency's AI goals and advise on removing barriers. OMB convenes and chairs an interagency council of them.

whitehouse.govM-25-21, Empower AI leadersShow it on the map

What this connects to

1 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.

Part of1

InstrumentOMB M-25-21: Accelerating Federal Use of AI through Innovation, Governance, and Public TrustBinding, sectoral

Verified against the official source on 2026-08-18. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.