Is Track performance and manage risk legally binding?

Q: Is Track performance and manage risk legally binding?

Track performance and manage risk is binding, sectoral in the United States. Binding, but only for a defined population: one regulated sector, or the federal government and the vendors it buys from. Contracts must let the agency see whether the AI is performing, and let it manage the risk it carries. Performance claims that cannot be measured are an acquisition problem, not a marketing one.

ObligationBinding, sectoral

Track performance and manage risk

Is this legally binding?

Binding, sectoral. Binding, but only for a defined population: one regulated sector, or the federal government and the vendors it buys from.

Contracts must let the agency see whether the AI is performing, and let it manage the risk it carries. Performance claims that cannot be measured are an acquisition problem, not a marketing one.

whitehouse.govM-25-22Show it on the map

What this connects to

1 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.

Part of1

InstrumentOMB M-25-22: Driving Efficient Acquisition of Artificial Intelligence in GovernmentBinding, sectoral

Verified against the official source on 2026-08-18. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.