Model Provider Responsibilities
Is this legally binding?
Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.
GUIDANCE interpreting binding PDPA: Model Providers processing personal data are 'organisations' subject to all PDPA obligations, with particular attention to Retention Limitation (document rationale for keeping training data; regularly review). As data intermediaries (e.g. inference hosting) they owe the Protection Obligation and should document access controls, residency, retention and incident response.
What this connects to
4 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Part of2
- ObligationRetention Limitation Obligation (s 25)Binding
Guideline interprets binding PDPA provision; guideline itself is not legally binding
- ObligationProtection Obligation (s 24)Binding
Guideline interprets binding PDPA provision; guideline itself is not legally binding
Cites1
Cited by1
- SectionDeployment, Data Protection Responsibilities of Generative AI StakeholdersGuidance
Structural decomposition of the source instrument
Verified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.