Skip to main content
TEN 07-25 for cte programs

AI Literacy Inside Career and Technical Education

TEN 07-25 is addressed to state CTE directors, and the DOL AI Literacy Framework names CTE curricula as an explicit delivery context for AI literacy. The framework's design for CTE: hands-on AI practice tied to the learner's field, delivered inside existing programs, with pathways from foundational literacy to occupation-specific proficiency.

Last verified against the DOL source: August 20, 2026. What changed

Straight from the framework

What TEN 07-25 says to you

CTE appears three times in the framework's logic: as an addressee (state CTE directors), as a delivery vehicle ("Delivering AI literacy as part of existing... CTE curricula"), and as a forward expansion target (DOL welcomes input on industry-specific guidance for "career and technical education"). The framework's literacy-vs-proficiency distinction is native CTE thinking: foundational literacy for every student, role-specific AI proficiency layered onto each career pathway.

The practical read

What it means for you

CTE is where the framework's "Embed Learning in Context" principle becomes concrete: the same AI literacy core lands differently in a health-sciences pathway than in manufacturing or business administration. The framework gives CTE directors a defensible answer to the question every CTE program is fielding, "where does AI go in our pathways?", without inventing new stand-alone courses: literacy embeds into existing curricula; proficiency attaches to the occupation.

Start here

Your first five moves

(1) adopt the five content areas as the cross-pathway literacy standard; (2) embed literacy modules inside existing pathway courses rather than adding sections; (3) contextualize examples per pathway (Principle 2's industry-specific approach); (4) train CTE instructors first (Principle 6 train-the-trainer); (5) define per-pathway AI proficiency expectations with your industry advisory boards.

Three of twelve

The provisions that matter most to you

At the price the checkout charges

How GAGE serves you

Institutional licensing: the literacy layer your faculty contextualize, plus an instructor track. Team seats run $89, $69 and $49 a seat by volume, from 10 seats, with a per-cohort evidence report.

GAGE for school districts

Questions from readers like you

Is AI literacy a CTE course or a cross-curricular standard?

The framework supports embedding it across existing curricula, and its delivery principles favor integration into programs learners are already in over standalone add-ons.

Will there be industry-specific federal guidance?

DOL has explicitly invited input on expanding the framework with industry-specific guidance for CTE, apprenticeships, and K-20 programs, the framework you build to now is the foundation that guidance will extend.

Score what you have against the framework

Sixty checkpoints, twelve provisions, about twelve minutes, and a dated report you can put in front of whoever asks. Free, and the answers never leave your browser unless you ask for the report by email.

TEN 07-25 for

GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education) is a private education company, not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Department of Labor. DOL does not certify or endorse training programs. Framework summaries are drawn from the public TEN 07-25 document. Read TEN 07-25 on dol.gov. Last verified: August 20, 2026.

Last verified against the DOL source: August 20, 2026. What changed