The DOL Framework as Your AI Literacy Curriculum Spec
TEN 07-25 names community and tribal colleges in its address block, and the DOL AI Literacy Framework gives them a curriculum specification: five content areas to teach, seven delivery principles to follow, and explicit permission to deliver AI literacy as a standalone module or embedded within existing programs.
Last verified against the DOL source: August 20, 2026. What changed
What TEN 07-25 says to you
The framework's provider guidance was written with you in the front row: review curricula for integration points; deliver hands-on practice "relevant to [learners'] field of study"; add industry-specific examples; build judgment exercises about AI outputs; create pathways "from foundational literacy to deeper role-specific skills"; and partner with local employers for regional relevance. The framework also names the delivery formats that fit the community college model: integration into "Registered Apprenticeships, CTE curricula, short-term credentialing programs, or reskilling efforts."
What it means for you
Community colleges are the natural delivery institution for this framework, you already run the workforce programs, the CTE pathways, the apprenticeships, and the adult basic education that Principle 4's prerequisite work depends on. The framework gives your curriculum committee a federal reference to design against, your grants office a vocabulary that matches federal priorities, and your workforce board a shared standard. The build-vs-license question is real: a 60-checkpoint curriculum with a quarterly refresh obligation (Principle 7) is a standing commitment, many colleges will license the literacy layer and invest their faculty hours in the contextualization the framework demands.
Your first five moves
(1) gap-map existing AI content against the 12 provisions; (2) decide standalone course vs. embedded modules per program area; (3) prioritize hands-on lab capacity over lecture content; (4) stand up the employer advisory loop; (5) set the quarterly refresh calendar, or partner for it.
The provisions that matter most to you
How GAGE serves you
Institutional licensing: the literacy layer your faculty contextualize, plus an instructor track. Team seats run $89, $69 and $49 a seat by volume, from 10 seats, with a per-cohort evidence report.
GAGE for community collegesQuestions from readers like you
Does the framework prefer standalone courses or embedded content?
It explicitly supports both: "whether integrating AI literacy as a standalone module or embedding the content within existing learning pathways."
How does this connect to apprenticeships?
Registered Apprenticeships are a named delivery context (Principle 2) and a named audience (the TEN goes to state apprenticeship agencies), AI literacy is meant to ride inside them.
Score what you have against the framework
Sixty checkpoints, twelve provisions, about twelve minutes, and a dated report you can put in front of whoever asks. Free, and the answers never leave your browser unless you ask for the report by email.
GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education) is a private education company, not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Department of Labor. DOL does not certify or endorse training programs. Framework summaries are drawn from the public TEN 07-25 document. Read TEN 07-25 on dol.gov. Last verified: August 20, 2026.
Last verified against the DOL source: August 20, 2026. What changed