Article 93: Measures the AI Office can require of model providers

This is the article that turns a finding into an outcome, and it is faster than a fine. The Commission may require a provider to take appropriate measures to comply with Articles 53 and 54, to implement mitigation measures where an evaluation under Article 92 has raised a serious and substantiated concern of systemic risk at Union level, or to restrict the making available of the model, to withdraw it or to recall it. A provider that receives a request may offer commitments through structured dialogue, and the Commission may make those commitments binding and declare that there are no further grounds for action. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1755, published in the Official Journal on 21 July 2026, sets out the procedure, including interim measures. The Commission is required to respect the rights of the defence and to give the provider the opportunity to be heard.

The official text, consolidated with the Digital Omnibus applied, with everything that cites it and everything it cites: Article 93 in the EU AI Act Explorer.

No tracked enforcement action expressly cites this article. The list below is the conduct that falls inside it, enforced so far under the GDPR or the Digital Services Act instead.

• Article 5: prohibited ai practices
• Article 50: transparency obligations for certain ai systems
• Article 51: classification of general purpose ai models with systemic risk
• Article 53: obligations for providers of general purpose ai models
• Article 55: obligations for providers of general purpose ai models with systemic risk
• Article 99: penalties imposed by member states
• Article 100: fines on union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies
• Article 101: fines on providers of general purpose ai models