Free public instrument from GAGE
The EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker
No. As of August 2026, no fine has been issued under the EU AI Act, whose enforcement powers began on 2 August 2026. This tracker records 18 verified AI enforcement actions in Europe: 80.91 million euro in confirmed fines, 5 million euro under appeal, 15 million euro annulled by a court, across 6 jurisdictions. Every entry is dated and sourced.
- 18
- Actions on record
- €80.9M
- Confirmed fines
- 0
- Fines under the AI Act
- 6
- Jurisdictions
3 open investigations
€5M under appeal, €15M annulled
Enforcement powers live since 2 August 2026
12 organisations, 7 authorities
As of August 2026, the GAGE EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker records 18 enforcement actions against AI systems in Europe, 80.91 million euro in confirmed fines, 5 million euro under appeal, and 0 fines issued under the AI Act itself. Counts are a floor, not a ceiling: authorities publish on their own timetable and some decisions are never announced.
Confirmed AI enforcement fines in Europe, by year
Bars are fines confirmed in that year. The gold line is the running total. Amounts annulled by a court are excluded from both, which is why the line never counts the 15 million euro the Court of Rome struck down in March 2026.
The closest thing to an AI Act action so far
Garante warns Myndoor over workplace emotion inference, citing AI Act Article 5(1)(f)
First published decision by a European authority that expressly invokes a prohibition in Article 5 of the AI Act. It is a warning, not a penalty, and the authority that issued it is a data protection authority rather than a designated market surveillance authority. The count of fines under the AI Act is still 0.
The ledger
Every enforcement action, newest first
18 records from 2022 to 2026. Each row opens a page carrying the full decision, the provisions it rests on, its timeline including any appeal, and the sources it was verified against. Filtering narrows what you see; it never changes what is here.
Showing all 18 records.
| Date | Authority | Target | Action | Regime | Amount | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-03 | GaranteItaly | Character Technologies, Inc.Character.AI companion chatbot platform | Fine | GDPR | €158K | Confirmed |
| 2026-05-14 | GaranteItaly | Myndoor S.r.l.Slack and Microsoft Teams plug in inferring employee stress from message content | Warning | GDPR, AI Act | Confirmed | |
| 2026-01-26 | CommissionEuropean Union | X (Twitter International Unlimited Company)Grok, deployed inside the X platform and as its recommender system | Investigation | DSA | Confirmed | |
| 2025-04-11 | Irish DPCIreland | X Internet Unlimited CompanyGrok large language models | Investigation | GDPR | Confirmed | |
| 2025-04-10 | GaranteItaly | Luka Inc.Replika AI companion | Fine | GDPR | €5M | Under appeal |
| 2025-01-30 | GaranteItaly | Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co. Ltd and Beijing DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co. LtdDeepSeek assistant | Ban | GDPR | Confirmed | |
| 2024-11-02 | GaranteItaly | OpenAI, L.L.C.ChatGPT | Fine | GDPR | €15M | Annulled |
| 2024-10-24 | GaranteItaly | Foodinho S.r.l. (Glovo group)Rider scoring, assignment and identity verification systems | Fine | GDPR | €5M | Confirmed |
| 2024-09-12 | Irish DPCIreland | Google Ireland LimitedPathways Language Model 2 (PaLM 2) | Investigation | GDPR | Confirmed | |
| 2024-09-04 | Irish DPCIreland | Twitter International Unlimited CompanyGrok large language models, trained on public posts from X | Interim measure | GDPR | Confirmed | |
| 2024-05-23 | EDPBEuropean Union | OpenAI, L.L.C.ChatGPT | Other | GDPR | Confirmed | |
| 2024-05-16 | Dutch DPANetherlands | Clearview AI Inc.Clearview AI facial recognition search engine | Fine | GDPR | €30.5M | Confirmed |
| 2024-04-29 | Austrian DSBAustria | OpenAI, L.L.C.ChatGPT | Complaint | GDPR | Confirmed | |
| 2023-12-11 | GaranteItaly | Comune di TrentoMarvel, Protector and Precrisis research projects: AI analysis of street camera and microphone feeds | Fine | GDPR | €50K | Confirmed |
| 2023-04-13 | CNILFrance | Clearview AI Inc.Clearview AI facial recognition search engine | Corrective order | GDPR | €5.2M | Confirmed |
| 2023-03-30 | GaranteItaly | OpenAI, L.L.C.ChatGPT | Interim measure | GDPR | Confirmed | |
| 2022-10-17 | CNILFrance | Clearview AI Inc.Clearview AI facial recognition search engine | Fine | GDPR | €20M | Confirmed |
| 2022-02-10 | GaranteItaly | Clearview AI Inc.Clearview AI facial recognition search engine | Fine | GDPR | €20M | Confirmed |
Answers
What people ask about EU AI Act enforcement
Has anyone been fined under the EU AI Act?
No. As of August 2026, no fine has been issued under the EU AI Act, whose enforcement powers began on 2 August 2026. This tracker records 18 verified AI enforcement actions in Europe: 80.91 million euro in confirmed fines, 5 million euro under appeal, 15 million euro annulled by a court, across 6 jurisdictions. Every entry is dated and sourced.
How many EU AI Act enforcement actions have there been?
1 under the AI Act itself. This tracker records 18 AI enforcement actions in Europe as of August 2026, of which 1 expressly invoke a provision of the AI Act and the rest are actions under the GDPR or the Digital Services Act against AI systems. 3 investigations are open. Treat the count as a floor, not a ceiling: authorities publish on their own timetable.
What is the largest AI fine in Europe?
30.5 million euro, imposed by the Dutch data protection authority on Clearview AI Inc. and announced on 3 September 2024. It is a GDPR fine, not an AI Act fine. The largest fine ever announced against a generative AI provider in Europe was 15 million euro against OpenAI in December 2024, and the Court of Rome annulled it in full on 18 March 2026.
What are the fines under the EU AI Act?
Three national tiers under Article 99: up to 35 million euro or 7 percent of worldwide turnover for prohibited practices under Article 5, up to 15 million euro or 3 percent for other operator obligations including the Article 50 transparency duties, and up to 7.5 million euro or 1 percent for supplying incorrect or misleading information to authorities. Providers of general purpose AI models face a separate Commission tier under Article 101, capped at 15 million euro or 3 percent. The 7 percent ceiling does not apply to model providers, which is the single most repeated error about the Act.
Who enforces the EU AI Act?
Three layers. The European Commission, through the AI Office, has exclusive competence over providers of general purpose AI models under Article 88 and can fine them under Article 101. National market surveillance authorities designated under Article 70 enforce everything else, including the Article 5 prohibitions and the Article 50 transparency duties. The European Data Protection Supervisor enforces against the Union's own institutions under Article 100. Data protection authorities act in parallel under the GDPR, and they are the authorities that have actually taken every AI enforcement action in Europe so far: 7 authorities appear on this tracker.
When did EU AI Act enforcement start?
Enforcement began in stages. The Article 5 prohibitions and the Article 4 AI literacy duty have applied since 2 February 2025. General purpose model obligations and the national penalty regime in Chapter XII applied from 2 August 2025, except Article 101. On 2 August 2026 the Article 50 transparency duties, the Commission's Article 101 fining power and the AI Office's full toolkit under Articles 88 to 94 all became applicable. The Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, moved the high risk dates to 2 December 2027 and 2 August 2028.
Which countries have designated AI Act authorities?
15 of the 27 member states have designated a market surveillance authority in national law as of August 2026, according to the register on this tracker. Designation and notification are different steps: the European Parliamentary Research Service recorded eight of 27 member states as having notified a single point of contact as of March 2026. The deadline in Article 70 was 2 August 2025. Every country's status, authority and legal basis has its own page here.
Every surface
Cut the record the way you need it
By provision of the AI Act
- Article 5: prohibited ai practices
- Article 50: transparency obligations for certain ai systems
- Article 51: classification of general purpose ai models with systemic risk
- Article 53: obligations for providers of general purpose ai models
- Article 55: obligations for providers of general purpose ai models with systemic risk
- Article 93: measures the ai office can require of model providers
- Article 99: penalties imposed by member states
- Article 100: fines on union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies
- Article 101: fines on providers of general purpose ai models
By authority
By jurisdiction where the action was taken
By sector
- Generative AI6
- Biometric identification4
- Platform AI3
- Companion chatbots2
- Gig work and algorithmic management1
- Public sector1
- Workplace AI1
Every member state, designation status and authority
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Netherlands
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
Every record page
- AIT-2026-0003: Character Technologies, Inc.
- AIT-2026-0002: Myndoor S.r.l.
- AIT-2026-0001: X (Twitter International Unlimited Company)
- AIT-2025-0002: X Internet Unlimited Company
- AIT-2025-0003: Luka Inc.
- AIT-2025-0001: Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co. Ltd and Beijing DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co. Ltd
- AIT-2024-0007: OpenAI, L.L.C.
- AIT-2024-0006: Foodinho S.r.l. (Glovo group)
- AIT-2024-0004: Google Ireland Limited
- AIT-2024-0005: Twitter International Unlimited Company
- AIT-2024-0008: OpenAI, L.L.C.
- AIT-2024-0003: Clearview AI Inc.
- AIT-2024-0002: OpenAI, L.L.C.
- AIT-2024-0001: Comune di Trento
- AIT-2023-0002: Clearview AI Inc.
- AIT-2023-0001: OpenAI, L.L.C.
- AIT-2022-0002: Clearview AI Inc.
- AIT-2022-0001: Clearview AI Inc.
The corrected timeline
When each part of the AI Act starts to bind
The Digital Omnibus is no longer a proposal. It is Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and in force since 27 July 2026, and it moved the high risk dates. Any timeline still showing Annex III high risk systems binding in August 2026 is out of date.
- In force
Entry into force
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 enters into force.
- In force
Prohibitions bind
Article 5 prohibited practices and the Article 4 AI literacy duty apply.
- In force
Models and penalties
General purpose model obligations, governance, and the Chapter XII penalties apply, except Article 101. Member states were due to designate their market surveillance authorities.
- In force
Enforcement era begins
Article 50 transparency applies, the Commission's Article 101 fining power over model providers becomes active, and the AI Office's full toolkit under Articles 88 to 94 switches on.
- Future
New prohibitions
Two further Article 5 prohibitions apply, covering AI generated non consensual intimate imagery and child sexual abuse material. The Article 50(2) marking grace period ends for pre existing generative systems.
- Future
Annex III high risk
Standalone high risk systems under Annex III start to bind, deferred from 2 August 2026 by the Digital Omnibus.
- Future
Annex I high risk
High risk systems embedded in regulated products under Annex I start to bind, deferred from 2 August 2027.
- Future
Legacy public systems
High risk systems already in use by public authorities must be brought into compliance.
Take the data
The whole dataset, free, in three formats
Licensed CC BY 4.0. Use it in an article, a paper, a slide or a product. The only condition is attribution, and the citation page gives you the line to paste.
- tracker.jsonEvery field of every record, the shape documented on the data page.
- tracker.csvOne row per action, for a spreadsheet or a stats package.
- feed.xmlAtom feed of new and updated records. Subscribe and never re check.
How the tracker is built, what counts as an action, and what the counts do not claim: the method page. Every change we have made, dated: the changelog. Something missing or wrong is a bug, and we want to hear about it.
Cite this page
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0, with attribution.
- In a sentence
- According to the GAGE EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker (as of 20 August 2026), eu ai act enforcement tracker.
- APA
- GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). (2026). EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker. EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://www.gage.academy/tools/eu-ai-act-enforcement-tracker
- MLA
- "EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker." EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker, GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education), 20 August 2026, https://www.gage.academy/tools/eu-ai-act-enforcement-tracker.
- Chicago
- GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). "EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker." EU AI Act Enforcement Tracker. Last modified 20 August 2026. https://www.gage.academy/tools/eu-ai-act-enforcement-tracker.
- Permalink
- https://www.gage.academy/tools/eu-ai-act-enforcement-tracker
Last updated . Every record re verified . The tracker is checked every Monday, and the same day for any action under the AI Act.