Skip to main content

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

A structured safety-engineering method, long standard in aerospace, automotive, and medical-device work, for listing every way a system can fail, how likely, how detectable, and how severe each failure is. Applied to AI, the method is unchanged but the failure modes (fabrication, variance, silent error) are new.

Defined in 3 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP).

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)

A structured safety-engineering method, long standard in aerospace, automotive, and medical-device work, for listing every way a system can fail, how likely, how detectable, and how severe each failure is. Applied to AI, the method is unchanged but the failure modes (fabrication, variance, silent error) are new.

Engineering Judgment and Professional Formation

An inductive, bottom-up method that examines each component or function of a system, identifies its plausible failure modes, and traces forward to the effect of each failure mode on the system, scoring severity, occurrence, and detection to prioritize which failure modes need attention first.

Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations

A long-established risk method from manufacturing and medicine that scores each failure mode on severity, occurrence, and detection and multiplies them into a Risk Priority Number to rank what to fix first. The direct ancestor of the three-axis AI method.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

Reviews purpose, data, affected people, accuracy, bias, security, oversight, vendors and law for a use case, scores likelihood and impact, and documents residual risk.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Keeps the living record: each risk with a named owner, rating, treatment, residual risk, monitoring metric, threshold and review date.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Recognizes hallucination, drift, skew, brittleness and biased outcomes, and knows how each one enters a system.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“risk assessment”“impact assessment”“algorithmic impact”“fundamental rights impact”“risk classification”“risk tiering”

Where the frameworks place it: NIST AI RMF MAP and MEASURE; ISO/IEC 42005; EU AI Act Article 27; NIST AI RMF MANAGE.

One interview question about it

Take me through an AI risk and impact assessment you would run for a hiring tool. What do you assess, and who signs?

Asked of candidates for ai risk and impact assessment. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

If you come from another field

Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.