Skip to main content

Post-incident review

The structured document written after a data incident's active response has ended, reconstructing what happened, identifying every contributing factor, crediting what worked, and converting the findings into checkable, owned, dated action items intended to permanently close the gaps the incident revealed.

Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in AI Data Governance: The Data Chair.

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

AI Data Governance: The Data Chair

The structured document written after a data incident's active response has ended, reconstructing what happened, identifying every contributing factor, crediting what worked, and converting the findings into checkable, owned, dated action items intended to permanently close the gaps the incident revealed.

Agentic AI Governance: Applied Mastery

A structured review conducted after an incident is resolved, examining what happened, how it was classified and handled, and what should change. Owned in depth by Topic 7.8's forensics treatment. (see Topic 7.8)

AI Data Governance: The Data Chair

The Module 11 artifact produced after a data incident, written in the blameless format this topic's glossary connects to the open decisions log's own honesty requirement; both depend on the same willingness to record uncomfortable specifics rather than a flattering summary.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first 7 topics of every program are free with a free account.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.