Prompt injection
An attack in which a malicious instruction is hidden in content an AI reads (a web page, a document, an email, a data field) to hijack its behavior. It is LLM01, the top-ranked entry in OWASP's Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025). For an agent, which holds tools, an injection can become a real action rather than just a wrong sentence, which is why OWASP's Top 10 for Agentic Applications (December 2025) carries it forward into tool-level risks like goal hijack and tool misuse.
Defined in 9 GAGE programs, which carry 25 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Transformation Professional (CATP).
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
An attack in which a malicious instruction is hidden in content an AI reads (a web page, a document, an email, a data field) to hijack its behavior. It is LLM01, the top-ranked entry in OWASP's Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025). For an agent, which holds tools, an injection can become a real action rather than just a wrong sentence, which is why OWASP's Top 10 for Agentic Applications (December 2025) carries it forward into tool-level risks like goal hijack and tool misuse.
A technique in which an attacker embeds instructions inside content an AI system will read (a document, a webpage, an email) so the system follows the attacker's hidden instructions rather than, or in addition to, its intended task. Related to poisoning but distinct: prompt injection attacks the system at inference time through content it reads, not through its training data.
A technique by which an attacker crafts input to a deployed AI system designed to manipulate the system into revealing information or taking actions it was not intended to disclose or perform, a mechanism this topic classifies as squarely within scope for data breach notification analysis whenever personal information or important data is disclosed as a result.
An AI-specific attack in which an adversary crafts natural-language inputs to override or subvert a language model's intended instruction set, redirecting its outputs toward harmful or unauthorized ends; a material additional threat for high-risk AI systems that incorporate LLM or GPAI components, assessed alongside the five Article 15(5) named categories.
A hostile use of the user-prompt dial in which crafted input attempts to override the system prompt and pull the model off its intended behavior. Because the user prompt is a dial adversaries reach too, the system prompt and guardrails must be designed to withstand it. The deep treatment is owned by the red-teaming topic. (see Topic 4.3)
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.
- Your Digital Foundation Assessment: Gateway Checkpoint · Digital Foundations, Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations
- What is AI? Definitions, History, and Types · AI Fundamentals, Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations
- AI Workflow Design Fundamentals and Preventing Technical Debt · Practical AI Workflow Design and Prompt Engineering, Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations
- Learning in the Flow of Work: Post-Graduation Tools · Assessment and Continuous Learning, Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations
- Prompt Injection and Jailbreak Defense · AI Security Fundamentals, Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations
- The Eight Components I · The Agent, Deconstructed, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- The Parts That Make an Agent Act · The Agent, Deconstructed, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- Who Decides the Next Step · Capability and Autonomy, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- Three Layers of Threat · Technical Controls and Threat Modeling, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- The injectable corpus: documents that attack the AI that reads them · Poison, Leaks, and the Adversary, Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP)
Where it shows up at work
A definition is where Prompt injection starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.
Understands prompt injection, data poisoning, model theft, insecure integrations and excessive agent privileges, and the controls that reduce each.
3 lessons on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Finds unapproved AI use, sets which tools are approved and what may be pasted, and detects leakage without policing every keystroke.
2 lessons on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Briefs a model like a good manager: context, constraints, examples, verification, and knows when to stop delegating.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Roles that hire for it
Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.
- Cybersecurity Risk Analystneeds working knowledge
- Chief Information Security Officer, AI security focusneeds it at depth
- Chief Technology Officer, AI engineering editionneeds it at depth
- AI Incident Response Leadneeds it at depth · 1 open posting this week
- AI Security Architectneeds it at depth · 8 open postings this week
- AI Governance Engineerneeds it at depth · 7 open postings this week
How job descriptions say it
Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.
Where the frameworks place it: OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications; Google SAIF; NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2; ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A.
One interview question about it
What are the security failure modes specific to AI systems, and which conventional control covers none of them?
Asked of candidates for ai security fundamentals. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.
If you come from another field
Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.
- Cybersecurity and IT carries it as a claim to back up: Threat modeling and control design transfer; the AI-specific threats are new.
- A computer science or software engineering degree carries it as a claim to back up: Security fundamentals are a course you took, not yet a control you ran.
- A cybersecurity or information assurance degree carries it as work you can show: Security fundamentals are your coursework and your labs.
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.