Re-review trigger
A defined condition, written into a committee's working-procedures document, under which a previously approved AI activity must return to the committee for reconsideration, typically a material change in training data, deployment scope, or affected population, rather than being treated as permanently covered by its original approval.
Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified China AI Regulatory Professional (CCARP).
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
A defined condition, written into a committee's working-procedures document, under which a previously approved AI activity must return to the committee for reconsideration, typically a material change in training data, deployment scope, or affected population, rather than being treated as permanently covered by its original approval.
A stated condition or date at which an accepted risk is revisited, preventing an accepted disposition from quietly becoming a permanent, unexamined blind spot.
A named future event (a new client, a new vendor, a new product feature, or a fixed calendar date) that should prompt a fresh cross-border analysis, preventing a scope conclusion from being treated as permanent once reached.
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.
- The Defense Method · The Capstone: Deploy and Defend, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- Cross-Border GenAI Services · Generative AI Compliance, Certified China AI Regulatory Professional (CCARP)
- Building an Ethics Committee · Ethics Review, Certified China AI Regulatory Professional (CCARP)
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.