Skip to main content

Three lines model

A governance framework in which the first line (operations/business) owns and manages risk, the second line (compliance/risk) provides oversight and monitoring, and the third line (internal audit) provides independent assurance; the AI compliance function most commonly sits in the second line for deployer organizations.

Defined in 3 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in EU AI Act Implementation Expert.

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

EU AI Act Implementation Expert

A governance framework in which the first line (operations/business) owns and manages risk, the second line (compliance/risk) provides oversight and monitoring, and the third line (internal audit) provides independent assurance; the AI compliance function most commonly sits in the second line for deployer organizations.

Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)

The Institute of Internal Auditors' July 2020 update to its earlier Three Lines of Defense framework, renamed to emphasize supporting sound decision-making alongside defensive risk management, while preserving the same structural separation between owning, validating, and auditing a risk.

Certified AI Practitioner: Workplace Foundations

The structure (first line: business units; second line: risk and compliance; third line: internal audit) that management runs to produce and assure AI risk information, which the board receives but does not operate.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where Three lines model starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

AI governance operating model designGovernance and Oversight

Designs decision rights, committees, intake, approval tiers and escalation so routine uses move and consequential uses get reviewed.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Turns technical uncertainty into a one-page decision: material risks, trends, exceptions, remediation, and what the board is being asked to accept.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Human oversight designGovernance and Oversight

Defines who reviews AI outputs, what they check, when they can override, and how to keep review from becoming a rubber stamp.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“governance framework”“governance program”“operating model”“decision rights”“approval process”“governance structure”

Where the frameworks place it: NIST AI RMF GOVERN; ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 5; EU AI Act Article 14; ISO/IEC 42001 Annex A.

One interview question about it

Sketch the governance operating model you would set up for a company deploying its first customer-facing AI. Who decides, who reviews, and who can stop it?

Asked of candidates for ai governance operating model design. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

If you come from another field

Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.