Skip to main content

Training

The process of showing a model many examples paired with desired answers and repeatedly adjusting the model's internal settings so its answers on those examples grow closer to the desired ones. Training does not teach a concept; it fits the cheapest available pattern in the supplied data that satisfies the objective.

Defined in 3 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP).

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)

The process of showing a model many examples paired with desired answers and repeatedly adjusting the model's internal settings so its answers on those examples grow closer to the desired ones. Training does not teach a concept; it fits the cheapest available pattern in the supplied data that satisfies the objective.

The AI Lobbyist: Certified AI Policy Strategist

The process of building an AI model by feeding it large quantities of data and adjusting its internal parameters until it reliably produces useful outputs. Training a frontier model is expensive, hardware-intensive, and happens infrequently relative to how often the resulting model is used.

Certified AI Transformation Professional (CATP)

The one-time (per version) process of building a model, energy-intensive but usually inherited from the vendor and counted in the buyer's Scope 3 rather than generated directly.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where Training starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

AI policy and standards writingGovernance and Oversight

Writes policies with scope, responsibilities, requirements, exceptions and evidence, so people can follow them and auditors can test them.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Explains training, tokens, context windows, embeddings, retrieval and fine-tuning well enough to ask an engineer a precise question and spot weak evidence.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Tracks executive orders, OMB guidance, agency rules and the state patchwork, and knows which state laws reach hiring, insurance and consumer decisions.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“policy development”“draft policies”“ai policy”“acceptable use policy”“standards and procedures”“policy writing”

Where the frameworks place it: ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 5.2; NIST AI RMF GOVERN 1; OMB M-25-21 and M-25-22; Colorado SB 24-205.

One interview question about it

Show me how you turn a principle like human oversight into a policy clause an engineer can implement and an auditor can test.

Asked of candidates for ai policy and standards writing. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

If you come from another field

Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.