DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act)
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, applicable from 17 January 2025, establishing ICT risk management and incident-reporting requirements for financial entities. Financial institutions subject to DORA are exempt from NIS2 for their ICT obligations. For AI-related cybersecurity incidents at financial institutions, DORA's reporting chain applies alongside (not instead of) the AI Act Article 73 serious-incident notification.
Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 2 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in EU AI Act Implementation Expert.
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, applicable from 17 January 2025, establishing ICT risk management and incident-reporting requirements for financial entities. Financial institutions subject to DORA are exempt from NIS2 for their ICT obligations. For AI-related cybersecurity incidents at financial institutions, DORA's reporting chain applies alongside (not instead of) the AI Act Article 73 serious-incident notification.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, in general application since 17 January 2025, requiring EU financial entities to manage ICT risk, including third-party ICT risk, comprehensively: maintaining a register of information on ICT third-party arrangements, conducting due diligence, embedding audit and access rights in contracts, and mapping subcontracting chains.
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.
- The customer audit: a major client demands proof of your data practices, live · Lineage Under Audit, Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP)
- Sector Overlap: MDR, IVDR, Financial Services, NIS2 and CRA · Regulatory Interplay and Liability, EU AI Act Implementation Expert
Where it shows up at work
A definition is where DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.
Compares the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and sector rules by intent and control objective, and says where they do not overlap.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Roles that hire for it
Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.
- Senior AI Compliance Analystneeds it at depth
- AI Compliance Managerneeds it at depth · 2 open postings this week
- Security Compliance Managerneeds it at depth · 4 open postings this week
- AI Compliance Specialistneeds working knowledge · 1 open posting this week
- AI Controls Analystneeds working knowledge
- Compliance Analystneeds working knowledge · 2 open postings this week
How job descriptions say it
Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.
Where the frameworks place it: EU AI Act; NIST AI RMF; ISO/IEC 42001.
One interview question about it
Map one control to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 at once, and tell me where the mapping breaks.
Asked of candidates for framework crosswalking without false equivalence. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.