Skip to main content

Model provenance

The documented, verifiable chain of custody for a dataset or model, including who created it, how, from what sources, and how its identity can be independently confirmed. Established through mechanisms like datasheets for datasets and platform organization-verification signals; the primary structural defense against poisoning attacks that rely on impersonating a trusted source. (see Topic 4.8)

Defined in 3 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP).

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP)

The documented, verifiable chain of custody for a dataset or model, including who created it, how, from what sources, and how its identity can be independently confirmed. Established through mechanisms like datasheets for datasets and platform organization-verification signals; the primary structural defense against poisoning attacks that rely on impersonating a trusted source. (see Topic 4.8)

Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)

The origin and ownership of the model a product depends on, including whether the core model is the vendor's own or a third party's, which upstream providers and sub-processors are in the chain, and where the training data came from. Undisclosed provenance means depending on a supply chain you cannot see.

The AI Lobbyist: Certified AI Policy Strategist

The ability to verify that a downloaded or deployed model file is authentically what it claims to be, trained by the organization it claims, with no undisclosed modification along the way.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where Model provenance starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

AI security fundamentalsSecurity and Resilience

Understands prompt injection, data poisoning, model theft, insecure integrations and excessive agent privileges, and the controls that reduce each.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Tiers vendors by use and impact, requests evidence instead of promises, tests in the customer's context, and plans monitoring and exit.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“ai security”“prompt injection”“data poisoning”“model theft”“llm security”“red team”

Where the frameworks place it: OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications; Google SAIF; NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2; NIST AI RMF GOVERN 6 and MANAGE 3.

One interview question about it

What are the security failure modes specific to AI systems, and which conventional control covers none of them?

Asked of candidates for ai security fundamentals. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

If you come from another field

Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.