Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA)
The continuous improvement cycle underlying the management-system clauses: Plan (Context, Leadership, Planning, Support), Do (Operation), Check (Performance evaluation), Act (Improvement). The same never-finishing loop the NIST framework describes as an operating system. (see Topic 6.2)
Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP).
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
A continuous improvement cycle formalized in quality management standards including ISO 9001 and structurally present in ISO/IEC 27001's information security management requirements. This topic's rebuild method (classify and rank findings, implement fixes, re-attack and measure, hand off the lesson) is a specific application of PDCA to adversarial data governance findings, not an invented process.
The continuous improvement cycle underlying the management-system clauses: Plan (Context, Leadership, Planning, Support), Do (Operation), Check (Performance evaluation), Act (Improvement). The same never-finishing loop the NIST framework describes as an operating system. (see Topic 6.2)
A continuous improvement cycle, developed from Walter Shewhart's work and popularized by W. Edwards Deming from the 1950s onward, used in this topic as the model for why a scorecard itself needs a standing review cadence rather than being built once and left unexamined.
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.
- Measuring quality so executives act: the scorecard that survives a board meeting · Quality as Physics, Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP)
- Governance that survives: rebuilding the estate's defenses so the next attack finds less · Adversarial Data Governance, Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP)
- ISO/IEC 42001: standing up an AI management system without drowning in it · The World's Rulebooks, Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)
Where it shows up at work
A definition is where Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.
Builds and audits an AI management system: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement and the Annex A controls.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Defines who reviews AI outputs, what they check, when they can override, and how to keep review from becoming a rubber stamp.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Writes policies with scope, responsibilities, requirements, exceptions and evidence, so people can follow them and auditors can test them.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Roles that hire for it
Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.
- AI Auditorneeds working knowledge · 9 open postings this week
- Responsible AI Leadneeds working knowledge · 7 open postings this week
- Senior AI Compliance Analystneeds working knowledge
- AI Governance Managerneeds it at depth
- AI Compliance Specialistneeds working knowledge · 1 open posting this week
- Ethical AI Specialistneeds working knowledge · 5 open postings this week
How job descriptions say it
Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.
Where the frameworks place it: ISO/IEC 42001:2023; ISO/IEC 23894; ISO/IEC 42005; EU AI Act Article 14.
One interview question about it
What does an ISO/IEC 42001 management system add that a set of policies does not, and how would you prepare for certification?
Asked of candidates for iso/iec 42001 management systems. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.
If you come from another field
Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.
- Compliance and regulatory affairs carries it as a claim to back up: Policy drafting is usually in the role, described rather than shown.
- Nonprofit program and grants oversight carries it as a claim to back up: Acceptable-use and program policy drafting is common.
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.