Skip to main content

Sunk cost fallacy

The reasoning error of treating past investment in an option (time, money, effort already spent) as a reason to continue with that option, even when the evidence about the best path forward from today has changed. Corrected by evaluating only forward-looking costs and benefits, with past investment factored in only insofar as it reduces the switching cost of staying.

Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Engineering Judgment and Professional Formation.

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Engineering Judgment and Professional Formation

The reasoning error of treating past investment in an option (time, money, effort already spent) as a reason to continue with that option, even when the evidence about the best path forward from today has changed. Corrected by evaluating only forward-looking costs and benefits, with past investment factored in only insofar as it reduces the switching cost of staying.

Certified AI Transformation Professional (CATP)

The reasoning that past investment justifies continued investment. Money already spent is irrelevant to whether the next dollar is well spent; treating it as relevant is a leading cause of zombie tolerance.

Engineering Judgment and Professional Formation

A well-documented bias in behavioral economics in which past, unrecoverable investment (time, money, effort) is treated as a reason to continue a course of action, when a sound decision should weigh only the costs and benefits that remain ahead. Named because the invested resource is "sunk," meaning it cannot be recovered regardless of what is decided next.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where Sunk cost fallacy starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

AI strategy and opportunity triageBusiness and Transformation

Decides where AI should be used, where it should not, and which use cases create measurable value, tied to the organization's priorities.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Buying AI wellBusiness and Transformation

Writes requirements, runs a fair evaluation, pilots within limits, and refuses a demo as evidence.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“ai strategy”“enterprise ai”“use case prioritization”“transformation strategy”“opportunity assessment”“vendor selection”

Where the frameworks place it: CISA software acquisition guidance.

One interview question about it

Fifty AI ideas are on the table. How do you pick the three worth doing, and how do you say no to the rest?

Asked of candidates for ai strategy and opportunity triage. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

If you come from another field

Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.