Skip to main content

Recital 128: In line with the commonly established notion of substantial modification

Recital 128, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

High-risk AI systemsProvider

(128) In line with the commonly established notion of substantial modification for products regulated by Union harmonisation legislation, it is appropriate that whenever a change occurs which may affect the compliance of a high-risk AI system with this Regulation (e.g. change of operating system or software architecture), or when the intended purpose of the system changes, that AI system should be considered to be a new AI system which should undergo a new conformity assessment. However, changes occurring to the algorithm and the performance of AI systems which continue to ‘learn’ after being placed on the market or put into service, namely automatically adapting how functions are carried out, should not constitute a substantial modification, provided that those changes have been pre-determined by the provider and assessed at the moment of the conformity assessment.

Related by text similarity

Matched by wording, not an explicit citation in the legal text.

Implementing this provision is a skill, not a lookup.

The EU AI Act Implementation Expert program teaches the working practice behind every article: classification, conformity, documentation, and the judgment to defend your decisions.

Mechanically consolidated from the official OJ texts of Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and 2026/1744 (the Digital Omnibus, in force 27 July 2026); unofficial pending the official EUR-Lex consolidation. Study aid, not legal advice; the official texts on EUR-Lex are authoritative.