Skip to main content

Recital 95: Without prejudice to applicable Union law, in particular Regulation (EU)

Recital 95, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

High-risk AI systems

(95) Without prejudice to applicable Union law, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2016/680, considering the intrusive nature of post-remote biometric identification systems, the use of post-remote biometric identification systems should be subject to safeguards. Post-remote biometric identification systems should always be used in a way that is proportionate, legitimate and strictly necessary, and thus targeted, in terms of the individuals to be identified, the location, temporal scope and based on a closed data set of legally acquired video footage. In any case, post-remote biometric identification systems should not be used in the framework of law enforcement to lead to indiscriminate surveillance. The conditions for post-remote biometric identification should in any case not provide a basis to circumvent the conditions of the prohibition and strict exceptions for real time remote biometric identification.

Related by text similarity

Matched by wording, not an explicit citation in the legal text.

Implementing this provision is a skill, not a lookup.

The EU AI Act Implementation Expert program teaches the working practice behind every article: classification, conformity, documentation, and the judgment to defend your decisions.

Mechanically consolidated from the official OJ texts of Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and 2026/1744 (the Digital Omnibus, in force 27 July 2026); unofficial pending the official EUR-Lex consolidation. Study aid, not legal advice; the official texts on EUR-Lex are authoritative.