Skip to main content

A2A (Agent2Agent)

An emerging interoperability protocol and family of related standards for agent-to-agent communication and identity attestation, allowing one AI agent to verify another's identity and authorization when they interact. Labeled emerging because standards in this space, including agent identity attestation broadly, remain immature and unconsolidated as of August 2026.

Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP).

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Certified AI Data Governance Professional (CADGP)

An emerging interoperability protocol and family of related standards for agent-to-agent communication and identity attestation, allowing one AI agent to verify another's identity and authorization when they interact. Labeled emerging because standards in this space, including agent identity attestation broadly, remain immature and unconsolidated as of August 2026.

Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)

A named communication protocol for agent-to-agent interaction, referenced by the WEF paper's protocol-layer treatment; full technical treatment is out of scope for this topic. (see Topic 1.2)

Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)

A protocol standard for agent-to-agent collaboration, letting one autonomous agent discover, identify, and exchange messages with another, complementary to MCP rather than competing with it.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where A2A (Agent2Agent) starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

Applies IMDA's Model AI Governance Framework, AI Verify and the PDPA alongside Western frameworks for organizations operating across Asia.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Compares the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and sector rules by intent and control objective, and says where they do not overlap.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Governs AI agents that take actions: tool access, least privilege, interruptibility, cascading actions and accountability for what an agent did.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“ai verify”“model ai governance framework”“map requirements”“framework alignment”“multiple frameworks”“unified control framework”

Where the frameworks place it: IMDA Model AI Governance Framework; PDPA; AI Verify; EU AI Act.

One interview question about it

Compare Singapore's approach to AI governance with the EU's, and say when a company should follow which.

Asked of candidates for singapore and apac ai governance frameworks. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.