IMDA (Infocomm Media Development Authority)
The Singapore government agency that regulates and develops the info-communications and media sectors, and the publisher of the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI and its predecessor frameworks.
Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 4 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP).
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
The Singapore government agency that regulates and develops the info-communications and media sectors, and the publisher of the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI and its predecessor frameworks.
The Singapore statutory board that publishes the Model AI Governance Framework family, including the Agentic AI edition this topic teaches.
The Singapore government body that developed the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI and its predecessor frameworks for traditional and generative AI.
The Singapore government agency that developed and published the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI.
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.
- Welcome to Applied Conformance · Taking the Controls, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- The Instrument · Taking the Controls, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- Why Singapore's Framework in Ohio · The Agent, Deconstructed, Certified Agentic AI Governance Professional (CAAGP)
- Map your agent policy to the world's first agentic framework · Agents Under Command, Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)
Where it shows up at work
A definition is where IMDA (Infocomm Media Development Authority) starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.
Compares the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and sector rules by intent and control objective, and says where they do not overlap.
2 lessons on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Applies IMDA's Model AI Governance Framework, AI Verify and the PDPA alongside Western frameworks for organizations operating across Asia.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Governs AI agents that take actions: tool access, least privilege, interruptibility, cascading actions and accountability for what an agent did.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Roles that hire for it
Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.
- Senior AI Compliance Analystneeds it at depth
- AI Compliance Managerneeds it at depth · 2 open postings this week
- Security Compliance Managerneeds it at depth · 4 open postings this week
- AI Compliance Specialistneeds working knowledge · 1 open posting this week
- AI Controls Analystneeds working knowledge
- Compliance Analystneeds working knowledge · 2 open postings this week
How job descriptions say it
Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.
Where the frameworks place it: EU AI Act; NIST AI RMF; ISO/IEC 42001; IMDA Model AI Governance Framework.
One interview question about it
Map one control to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 at once, and tell me where the mapping breaks.
Asked of candidates for framework crosswalking without false equivalence. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.