Skip to main content

Five Whys

A root cause analysis technique originating in the Toyota Production System, in which an investigator repeatedly asks "why" to trace a symptom back to a deeper cause. Useful for going deeper on a single line of causation; not, by itself, a method for discovering that multiple independent contributing factors exist.

Defined in 4 GAGE programs, which carry 5 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in AI Data Governance: The Data Chair.

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Engineering Judgment and Professional Formation

A root-cause analysis technique, associated with Toyota engineer Taiichi Ohno, that repeatedly asks "why" to move from a surface symptom to a deeper underlying cause. Referenced here as a real precedent for the disciplined, evidence-based habit the judgment portfolio builds; the full technique is taught in Module 3. (see Topic 3.3)

AI Data Governance: The Data Chair

A root cause analysis technique originating in the Toyota Production System, in which an investigator repeatedly asks "why" to trace a symptom back to a deeper cause. Useful for going deeper on a single line of causation; not, by itself, a method for discovering that multiple independent contributing factors exist.

AI Governance: Applied Mastery

The habit, from Toyota's production system, of asking "why" of each answer in turn until you reach a condition you can actually change rather than a description of the output. The number is not sacred; the discipline of not stopping early is.

AI Literacy & Professional Conduct

A root-cause technique that asks "why?" repeatedly, each answer feeding the next, to drill from a surface symptom down to a systemic process cause; foundational to the Toyota Production System under Taiichi Ohno.

Engineering Judgment and Professional Formation

A root cause method, credited to Taiichi Ohno of the Toyota Production System, in which an investigator asks "why" repeatedly about a failure and each successive answer, continuing past the first plausible explanation until the chain reaches a structural condition that a specific engineering or process change can correct.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first 7 topics of every program are free with a free account.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.