Deep Synthesis Provisions
Issuer: CAC + ministries
Date: 10 JAN 2023
Status: IN FORCE in China, as of 29 JUL 2026
Real-name, consent of impersonated persons, prominent labeling, algorithm filing.
The first binding deepfake rules anywhere: real-name verification of users, security assessments, consent of any person whose likeness or voice is synthesized, prominent labeling of synthetic content, and algorithm filing. Wrapped later by the 2025 Labeling Measures + GB 45438-2025.
What it actually requires (3 provisions)
- Real-name user verification + security assessments
- Consent of impersonated individuals before synthesizing likeness/voice
- Prominent labeling of synthetic content; provider algorithm filing
How its status moved
- ISSUEDNov to Dec 2022
- EFFECTIVE10 Jan 2023
- CURRENTIn force: ~5,672 deep-synthesis algorithms filed
Sources (1)
Deep Synthesis: Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services
First binding deepfake rules: real-name, consent of impersonated persons, prominent labeling, algorithm filing.
The rest of the China stack
12 more instruments in this jurisdiction, each with its own status, provisions and sources.
- Algorithm Recommendation ProvisionsIN FORCEFirst binding algorithm rules; opt-out of feeds; anti-cocoon; created the CAC filing registry.
- GenAI Interim Measures (CAC Order No. 15)IN FORCEPublic GenAI needs security assessment + filing before launch (Art. 17); socialist-core-values content duties.
- CAC filing registriesIN FORCE868 GenAI services + 530 apps (Apr 2026); ~5,672 deep-synthesis algorithms in 14 batches; >5,000 recommendation algorithms; public lists.
- AI Content Labeling Measures + GB 45438-2025IN FORCEDual explicit + implicit labels; platform verification; tampering prohibited.
- Facial Recognition Security MeasuresIN FORCECommercial FR: consent, DPIA, local storage, mandatory-scan bans, 100k-faces filing; state use via PIPL Art. 26 carve-out.
- Anthropomorphic AI Interaction Measures (Decree No. 21)IN FORCEWorld-first companion rulebook: disclosure each session, 2-hr break prompts, minor companion ban, ≤RMB 200k fines; Doubao/Qwen features shut at deadline.
- AI Safety Governance Framework v1.0/v2.0VOLUNTARY / SOFT LAWFirst cross-scenario risk classification; lifecycle duties; agents & embodied AI in v2.0.
- TC260 mandatory/voluntary standardsIN FORCEGB/T 45654-2025, GB/T 45652-2025 (eff. Nov 2025), GB/T 42888-2023; WG9 AI Security Working Group (2026); 400+ standards.
- Comprehensive national AI lawNOT ENACTED2025 legislative plans softened commitment; official draft reported Dec 2025 ⚠; AI provisions instead folded into amended Cybersecurity Law (eff. 1 Jan 2026).
- PBOC Credit Reporting MeasuresIN FORCECredit scoring = licensed business; explainable, traceable, filed models; mainland data storage.
- Shanghai AI Industry RegulationIN FORCEFirst provincial AI law; sandbox, graded management, ethics council; Art. 69 recruitment non-discrimination.
- Global AI Governance Initiative (2023) + Action Plan (Jul 2025)IN FORCE13-point roadmap; proposed Global AI Cooperation Organization, potential Shanghai HQ.
Where this sits in the wider picture
- The China regime dossier gives the doctrine this instrument belongs to, next to the other two jurisdictions.
- The Framework Explorer, filtered to CN lists every instrument in this jurisdiction in one filterable index.
- The governance simulator shows what these rules do to a real AI system, next to what the other two jurisdictions do to the same one.
- The timeline places this date beside what the other capitals were doing that month.
Knowing the instrument is step one. Complying with it is the job.
The programs teach the work that follows a rule like this one: classification calls, conformity assessment, filings, documentation, and the judgment to defend every decision.
VERIFIED 29 JUL 2026. Every fact on this page is drawn from the sources listed above and dated to the day it was checked. Study aid, not legal advice: the official texts are always authoritative.