Fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA)
An assessment required by Article 27 of the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) before certain deployers put a high-risk Annex III AI system into use. It must describe the processes and intended use, the period and frequency of use, the categories of persons and groups affected, the specific fundamental-rights risks, the human-oversight measures, and the measures to be taken if risks materialize, including governance and complaint mechanisms.
Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 5 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in AI Governance: Applied Mastery.
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
An assessment required by Article 27 of the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) before certain deployers put a high-risk Annex III AI system into use. It must describe the processes and intended use, the period and frequency of use, the categories of persons and groups affected, the specific fundamental-rights risks, the human-oversight measures, and the measures to be taken if risks materialize, including governance and complaint mechanisms.
The assessment required by Article 27 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, to be performed prior to deploying a qualifying high-risk AI system, examining the impact of the system's use on fundamental rights under the EU Charter, including non-discrimination, equal treatment, dignity, and access to remedies.
The assessment (Article 27) that certain deployers of high-risk systems must conduct before deployment, evaluating the system's impact on people's rights. Its full treatment, alongside the data protection impact assessment, is the owned scope of Topic 10.4. (see Topic 10.4)
A structured assessment of how an AI system may affect people's rights, run alongside a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) in the joint approach taught in Topic 10.4. It is named here because a conceded gap in rights testing, such as missing demographic accuracy testing, is often the amendment that a FRIA would have surfaced before deployment. (see Topic 10.4)
The Article 27 assessment some deployers of high-risk systems must perform (public bodies, private entities providing public services, and deployers of the Annex III creditworthiness and insurance-risk systems); the expert facilitates it but does not provide binding human-rights legal analysis.
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first 7 topics of every program are free with a free account.
- The conformity file: assembling the evidence for the system you shipped in Module 3 · The EU AI Act: The Executive Map, AI Governance: Applied Mastery
- The DPIA and FRIA, run jointly: one assessment, two regimes, no duplicate work · Evidence Engineering, AI Governance: Applied Mastery
- Defending the file: the live challenge and the amendments you concede · Adversarial Governance, AI Governance: Applied Mastery
- Role Definition: What an EU AI Act Expert Does (and Doesn't) · The EU AI Act Expert Role, EU AI Act Implementation Expert
- AI Act and GDPR: FRIA vs DPIA · Regulatory Interplay and Liability, EU AI Act Implementation Expert
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.