Implementing act
A legally binding Commission act adopted under the examination procedure of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, requiring qualified-majority approval from Member States in committee. Common specifications under Article 41 are adopted as implementing acts.
Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in EU AI Act Implementation Expert.
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
A legally binding Commission act adopted under the examination procedure of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, requiring qualified-majority approval from Member States in committee. Common specifications under Article 41 are adopted as implementing acts.
A Commission instrument that specifies uniform conditions for applying an already-adopted EU law, distinct from a delegated act's role of filling in substantive technical detail.
An act the Commission adopts to ensure uniform application of EU law, typically subject to a comitology committee vote under the examination or advisory procedure.
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.
- The EU Machine: Parliament, Commission, and the AI Office · Government and Policy Navigation, The AI Lobbyist: Certified AI Policy Strategist
- Working the Commission: Consultations, Expert Groups, and Comitology · The Brussels File: Influence Inside the EU Institutions, The AI Lobbyist: Certified AI Policy Strategist
- Common Specifications When Standards Lag · Standards and Conformity Assessment, EU AI Act Implementation Expert
Where it shows up at work
A definition is where Implementing act starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.
Knows how a rule becomes a rule, drafts comments for the record that get read, and prepares testimony and briefings for hearings.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Convenes partners across industry, civil society and government, keeps a stakeholder map current, and gets many parties to one position.
One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.
Roles that hire for it
Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.
- AI Policy Analystneeds working knowledge · 7 open postings this week
How job descriptions say it
Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.
Where the frameworks place it: Administrative Procedure Act.
One interview question about it
How would you prepare a comment on a proposed AI rule, and what makes a comment change the outcome?
Asked of candidates for rulemaking, comments and legislative process. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.
If you come from another field
Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.
- Policy, legislative and government affairs staff carries it as work you can show: Comments for the record and hearing prep are your artifacts.
- A public policy, political science or international relations degree carries it as a claim to back up: Rulemaking and the legislative process were taught, not yet worked.
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.