Skip to main content

Harmonised standard

Under European Union law, a standard developed by a European standardization organization (CEN, CENELEC, or ETSI) at the Commission's request and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Conforming to a harmonised standard triggers a presumption of conformity with the corresponding legal requirement (EU AI Act, Article 40). As of 2026 the first AI Act harmonised standards were still being finalized.

Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 7 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP).

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)

Under European Union law, a standard developed by a European standardization organization (CEN, CENELEC, or ETSI) at the Commission's request and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Conforming to a harmonised standard triggers a presumption of conformity with the corresponding legal requirement (EU AI Act, Article 40). As of 2026 the first AI Act harmonised standards were still being finalized.

EU AI Act Implementation Expert

A European Standard (EN) produced by a recognized European standardisation organisation (CEN, CENELEC, or ETSI) in response to a Commission standardisation request, whose reference has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union under Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. Compliance with a harmonised standard grants a presumption of conformity with the legal requirements it covers.

EU AI Act Implementation Expert

A European standard adopted on the basis of a standardisation request from the European Commission and listed in the Official Journal. Compliance with a harmonised standard creates a presumption of conformity with the essential requirements of the relevant EU legislation covered by that standard. Article 40 of the AI Act governs the presumption of conformity for harmonised standards.

EU AI Act Implementation Expert

A standard adopted by a European standardisation organisation (CEN, CENELEC, or ETSI) under a Commission standardisation request, the reference of which is published in the Official Journal of the EU. Providers who conform to a harmonised standard earn the Article 40 presumption of conformity.

EU AI Act Implementation Expert

A European standard adopted by a European standardisation organisation (CEN, CENELEC, or ETSI) pursuant to a Commission standardisation request under Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, whose reference is published in the Official Journal; conformity with a harmonised standard grants the Article 40(1) presumption of conformity to the extent the standard covers the relevant requirements.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where Harmonised standard starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

Decides what a person affected by an AI decision must be told, how an output can be explained, and how they can challenge it.

2 lessons on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Builds and audits an AI management system: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement and the Annex A controls.

2 lessons on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Classifies a system by role and risk tier, knows which obligations bind on which date after the Digital Omnibus, and what evidence conformity needs.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“disclosure to users”“model cards”“system cards”“iso 42001”“iso/iec 42001”“ai management system”

Where the frameworks place it: EU AI Act Articles 13 and 50; NIST AI RMF trustworthiness characteristics; ISO/IEC 42001:2023; ISO/IEC 23894.

One interview question about it

A customer asks why the model decided against them. What can you explain, what can you not, and how can they contest it?

Asked of candidates for explainability, transparency and contestability. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

If you come from another field

Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.