Sector weighting
The practice of directing an evidence schedule's heaviest artifact and tightest cadence toward whichever evidence category carries the most exposure for a given deployer's sector, fairness testing for a regulated lender, transparency documentation for a public body, technical documentation and monitoring for a general EU AI Act high-risk deployer, rather than weighting every category equally.
Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 2 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Transformation Professional (CATP).
How each discipline defines it
The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.
The practice of directing an evidence schedule's heaviest artifact and tightest cadence toward whichever evidence category carries the most exposure for a given deployer's sector, fairness testing for a regulated lender, transparency documentation for a public body, technical documentation and monitoring for a general EU AI Act high-risk deployer, rather than weighting every category equally.
The pattern, taught in Section 3H, by which the same four risk categories carry different relative importance depending on the client's industry, so a translation effort should address whichever category actually dominates that client's sector first.
Where it is taught
The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.
- Translating Corporate AI Risk into Policy Talking Points · Business and Industry Representation, The AI Lobbyist: Certified AI Policy Strategist
- Negotiating Evidence Rights You Will Actually Use · Technology, Platforms and Vendors, Certified AI Transformation Professional (CATP)
Terms it appears with
Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.