Automation bias
Is this legally binding?
Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.
The tendency to over-trust an automated system, especially when it has performed reliably in the past; a bigger concern as humans supervise increasingly capable agents, requiring adapted human-in-the-loop measures.
From the source
“automation bias, or the tendency to over-trust an automated system, especially when it has performed reliably in the past”
Section 2.2, p.13
What this connects to
3 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Operationalises1
Cited by2
- ObligationRegularly audit the effectiveness of human oversightGuidance
Audits counter automation bias in oversight
- ObligationMonitor human override rates and response times (v1.5)GuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
v1.5 countermeasure targeting automation bias; secondary-verified
Learn this properly
This page tells you what Automation bias is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.