Perform threat modelling and taint tracing
Is this legally binding?
Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.
Organisations should use threat modelling, and taint tracing for complex multi-agent workflows, to systematically identify how attackers could compromise the system; CSA's Draft Addendum on Securing Agentic AI provides methods.
From the source
“Common security threats to agentic systems include memory poisoning, tool misuse, and privilege compromise.”
Section 2.1.1, p.10
What this connects to
2 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Cites1
- InstrumentSecuring Agentic AI, Addendum to the Guidelines and Companion Guide on Securing AI SystemsGuidance
'organisations may refer to CSA's Draft Addendum on Securing Agentic AI' for threat modelling and taint tracing
Learn this properly
This page tells you what Perform threat modelling and taint tracing is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.