Principle 3: Security and Safety
Is this legally binding?
Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.
AI systems should be secure and safe, protected against attacks and failures that could cause harm.
What this connects to
2 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Maps across to2
- External frameworkArticle 15: Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurityBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Security and safety principle anticipates Article 15 robustness/cybersecurity
- External frameworkFunction: MANAGEGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Security and safety treatments belong to MANAGE
Learn this properly
This page tells you what Principle 3: Security and Safety is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.