Identify risks associated with the agent's capabilities
Is this legally binding?
Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.
Take a capability-centric approach: be precise about the impact of an agent's operation and potential failure, and identify the different actions involved in realising each capability to surface associated risks.
What this connects to
1 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Maps across to1
- External frameworkFunction: MAPGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Capability-centric risk identification is MAP analysis
Learn this properly
This page tells you what Identify risks associated with the agent's capabilities is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.