FEAT Principle 14: Transparency
Is this legally binding?
Supervisory expectation. Not law. It is what your supervisor examines you against, which is not the same as optional.
FEAT Principle 14 (Transparency): on request, data subjects should receive clear explanations of the consequences that AIDA-driven decisions may have on them.
From the source
“Data subjects are provided, upon request, clear explanations on the consequences that AIDA-driven decisions may have on them.”
Section 4 Summary of Principles, p.6
What this connects to
2 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Cites2
- InstrumentPrinciples to Promote Fairness, Ethics, Accountability and Transparency (FEAT) in the Use of AI and Data Analytics in Singapore's Financial SectorSupervisory expectation
Numbered principle in FEAT Section 4
- ConceptFEAT principle: TransparencySupervisory expectation
Principle sits under the transparency pillar
Learn this properly
This page tells you what FEAT Principle 14: Transparency is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.