Discussion Paper 'Generative AI: Implications for Trust and Governance'
Is this legally binding?
Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.
Superseded. Kept on the map because programmes built against it are now built against nothing.
IMDA, Aicadium and AI Verify Foundation published the discussion paper in June 2023, identifying six key risks of generative AI and six initial governance dimensions; the conceptual foundation for the MGF for Generative AI.
On the timeline
- 2023-06-01Discussion paper "Generative AI: Implications for Trust and Governance"
What this connects to
3 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Issued by1
- AgencyAI Verify Foundation (AIVF)Guidance
Jointly published by IMDA, Aicadium and AI Verify Foundation
Applies to1
- InstrumentModel AI Governance Framework for Generative AI (2024)GuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Milestone event for the instrument
Cited by1
- EventProposed Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI released for consultationConsultation
Press release: proposed framework integrates ideas from the June 2023 discussion paper
Learn this properly
This page tells you what this instrument is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.