Skip to main content
ObligationConsultationConsultation

Proposed: ai identification

Is this legally binding?

Consultation. Proposed, not final. Read it, plan for it, and do not treat it as settled.

Proposed and not final. Nothing here can be enforced against you yet.

PROPOSED expectation (Guidelines para 3.2): systems, policies and procedures for consistent identification of AI usage across the FI, with clear assigned roles and responsibilities. Not final, at consultation stage.

From the source

“An FI should establish systems, policies and procedures to ensure the consistent identification of AI usage across all relevant business and functional areas.”

Consultation Paper P017-2025 / proposed Guidelines (see summary for paragraph)
mas.gov.sgShow it on the map

What this connects to

2 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.

Learn this properly

This page tells you what Proposed: ai identification is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.

See the AI Governance program

Verified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.

Useful to someone you work with?

GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.