Proposed: third party ai management
Is this legally binding?
Consultation. Proposed, not final. Read it, plan for it, and do not treat it as settled.
Proposed and not final. Nothing here can be enforced against you yet.
PROPOSED expectation (Guidelines para 4.11): controls for third-party AI covering transparency, fairness due diligence, and supply chain assessments; existing MAS outsourcing/third-party requirements continue to apply. Not final, at consultation stage.
From the source
“An FI should ensure that onboarding, development and deployment controls for third-party AI are adequate for the risk materiality of the use case, system or model”
Consultation Paper P017-2025 / proposed Guidelines (see summary for paragraph)
What this connects to
2 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Cites2
- SectionProposed Guidelines Section 4: key AI life cycle controlsConsultation
Proposed expectation within this section of the draft Guidelines
- InstrumentConsultation Paper on Proposed Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence Risk Management for Financial Institutions (P017-2025)Consultation
Proposed expectation in P017-2025 (not final)
Learn this properly
This page tells you what Proposed: third party ai management is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.