Area 2: Determining the Level of Human Involvement in AI-augmented Decision-making
Is this legally binding?
Guidance. Voluntary guidance. Best practice, not obligation, until a contract or a regulator cites it.
Second area: organisations should decide the appropriate degree of human involvement in AI-augmented decision-making, based on the probability and severity of harm to individuals, applying a design framework of human-in-the-loop, human-over-the-loop or human-out-of-the-loop.
What this connects to
15 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Part of2
- InstrumentModel AI Governance Framework, 2nd Edition (2020)Guidance
- SectionGuiding principles of the Model FrameworkGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Each area translates the two guiding principles into practice
Contains2
Operationalised by4
Cited by1
- SectionDimension 2: Make humans meaningfully accountableGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Adapts MGF's human-in-the-loop design framework for agents, addressing automation bias
Maps across to4
- External frameworkClause 8: OperationStandardGAGE analysis, not official
Determining human involvement is operationalised through AIMS operational controls
- External frameworkFunction: MAPGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Risk-based human involvement decisions presuppose MAP context and risk identification
- External frameworkArticle 14: Human oversightBindingGAGE analysis, not official
Human-in/over/out-of-the-loop model anticipates Article 14 human oversight
- External frameworkFunction: GOVERNGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
Assigning human oversight roles is a GOVERN accountability outcome
Mapped across from2
- SectionISAGO Section 3: Human involvement in AI-augmented decision-makingGuidance
ISAGO section mirrors the corresponding Model Framework area
- SectionComponent: Determining the level of human involvementGuidanceGAGE analysis, not official
ASEAN Guide adapted MGF 2.0's human-involvement model incl. HITL/HOTL/HOOTL
Learn this properly
This page tells you what this instrument is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.