Part 6, Care of Personal Data
Is this legally binding?
Binding. Binding law. It applies to everyone in scope, whether or not anyone points at it.
Stewardship duties: accuracy (s 23), protection via reasonable security arrangements (s 24), retention limitation (s 25), and restrictions on transferring personal data outside Singapore (s 26).
What this connects to
5 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Contains1
- SectionDeployment, Data Protection Responsibilities of Generative AI StakeholdersGuidance
Guideline interprets binding PDPA provision; guideline itself is not legally binding
Cites4
- ObligationAccuracy Obligation (s 23)Binding
Structural decomposition of the source instrument
- ObligationProtection Obligation (s 24)Binding
Structural decomposition of the source instrument
- ObligationRetention Limitation Obligation (s 25)Binding
Structural decomposition of the source instrument
- ObligationTransfer Limitation Obligation (s 26)Binding
Structural decomposition of the source instrument
Learn this properly
This page tells you what Part 6, Care of Personal Data is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.