Skip to main content

Incident response

The rehearsed set of roles, decisions, and steps an organization runs when a live system starts causing harm. It is picked up on purpose at a defined moment (the declaration), not fallen into as a scramble, and its purpose is to override the wrong instincts humans default to under pressure.

Defined in 2 GAGE programs, which carry 3 distinct definitions of it. The wording above is taught in Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP).

How each discipline defines it

The same term does different work depending on who is using it. These are the definitions as each program teaches them, unedited.

Certified AI Governance Professional (CAIGP)

The rehearsed set of roles, decisions, and steps an organization runs when a live system starts causing harm. It is picked up on purpose at a defined moment (the declaration), not fallen into as a scramble, and its purpose is to override the wrong instincts humans default to under pressure.

Certified AI Transformation Professional (CATP)

The pre-agreed plan for a serious failure: who is called, who can pause or roll back the system, and what gets communicated to whom, how fast. Written before the incident, because the incident is the worst time to design it.

Certified AI Transformation Professional (CATP)

The pre-built process (detect, triage, contain, investigate, remediate, report and log) that turns an AI failure into a contained, corrected, and documented event rather than a discovery-day surprise.

Where it is taught

The exact lessons this term appears in. The first module of every program is free with a free account.

Where it shows up at work

A definition is where Incident response starts. The lessons above teach it inside the competencies below, which are what job descriptions ask for and what the GAGE credential records. Every link here is drawn from the same careers map that builds a role's readiness check.

Classifies AI incidents by severity, runs containment, preserves evidence, manages notification, and closes the loop with lessons learned.

2 lessons on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Collects, labels and preserves the evidence that a control operated, a decision was made, and a claim can be defended to an auditor or regulator.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Tiers vendors by use and impact, requests evidence instead of promises, tests in the customer's context, and plans monitoring and exit.

One lesson on this page teach it as a primary outcome.

Roles that hire for it

Each role page shows the full competency set, what the seat decides, and a readiness check against your own evidence.

How job descriptions say it

Postings rarely use the textbook word. These are the phrases the careers map reads as asking for the competencies above.

“incident response”“incident management”“serious incident”“audit evidence”“record keeping”“decision log”

Where the frameworks place it: EU AI Act Article 73; ISO/IEC 42001 Annex A incident controls; NIST AI RMF MANAGE 4; EU AI Act Articles 11 and 12.

One interview question about it

An AI system has just caused harm to a customer. Walk me through the first 48 hours.

Asked of candidates for ai incident response and recovery. Answering it in your own words is exactly how a GAGE topic is passed, and the credential records the pass where an employer can check it.

If you come from another field

Some backgrounds already carry this competency, and the readiness check gives credit for it.

Terms it appears with

Not an alphabetical neighbourhood: these are the terms taught in the same lessons, ranked by how often they appear together.