FEAT principle: Fairness
Is this legally binding?
Supervisory expectation. Not law. It is what your supervisor examines you against, which is not the same as optional.
AIDA-driven decisions and decision-assistance should not systematically disadvantage individuals or groups unless justified; personal attributes used as inputs must be justified; data and models must be regularly reviewed and validated for accuracy, relevance and unintentional bias (Principles 1-4).
From the source
“Individuals or groups of individuals are not systematically disadvantaged through AIDA-driven decisions unless these decisions can be justified.”
Section 4 Summary of Principles, p.6
What this connects to
5 relations. Official relations are the ones the source documents state; anything marked GAGE analysis is our reading, not an agency's.
Cites1
Cited by4
- ObligationFEAT Principle 01: Fairness, justifiabilitySupervisory expectation
Principle sits under the fairness pillar
- ObligationFEAT Principle 02: Fairness, justifiabilitySupervisory expectation
Principle sits under the fairness pillar
- ObligationFEAT Principle 03: Fairness, accuracy and biasSupervisory expectation
Principle sits under the fairness pillar
- ObligationFEAT Principle 04: Fairness, accuracy and biasSupervisory expectation
Principle sits under the fairness pillar
Learn this properly
This page tells you what FEAT principle: Fairness is and whether it binds you. The AI Governance program teaches the whole discipline, with dedicated coverage of the Singapore governance stack and the MAS regime, and every topic is passed by explaining it back in your own words, graded against the source.
See the AI Governance programVerified against the official source on 2026-08-17. GAGE is not affiliated with or endorsed by any agency named here, and nothing on this page is legal advice. How this is built and checked.
Readers of this also ask
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.