The standard for harm with no broken part is SOTIF, written for road vehicles and borrowed by everyone else
ISO 21448:2022 addresses the safety of the intended functionality: unreasonable risk from functional insufficiencies or from foreseeable misuse, where nothing has failed. Published in June 2022 at 181 pages by the road vehicles committee, it is the closest published framework for a perception stack that is simply wrong about the world.
The verdict
Verified
The document exists. The ledger fetched it at its publisher and quotes it.
Key facts
What the sources say
- Record ID
- PAG-2026-0024
- Kind
- Standard
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Last verified
- Added
- ISO 21448:2022 is edition 1, published 2022-06, 181 pages, from ISO technical committee 22, and ISO marks it at stage 90.92, to be revised.
- It covers hazards caused by functional insufficiencies of specification or by performance insufficiencies in the implementation of electrical and electronic elements.
- It excludes faults covered by the ISO 26262 series, cybersecurity threats and deliberate actions that clearly violate intended use, which it treats as feature abuse.
- It gives guidance on design, verification and validation measures and on activities during the operation phase.
Dimension by dimension
3 dimensions, each one stated, silent or open
The machine, The AI inside it, Liability. Stated means the document you can open below says it; silent means the ledger read the document and it does not.
- The machineStated
- It handles the case where every component works as designed and the system still creates a hazard.ISO, ISO 21448:2022 Road vehicles, Safety of the intended functionality, primary source, 1 June 2022.
- The AI inside itStated
- Perception and decision insufficiencies are the subject matter, which is why robotics teams outside automotive adopt it.ISO, ISO 21448:2022 Road vehicles, Safety of the intended functionality, primary source, 1 June 2022.
- LiabilitySilent
- The document is a safety framework and settles nothing about who pays when the insufficiency causes harm.ISO, ISO 21448:2022 Road vehicles, Safety of the intended functionality, primary source, 1 June 2022.
What it changes
For a robot maker or a deployer
When your robot hurts someone and nothing broke, SOTIF is the vocabulary you will be asked to argue in: triggering conditions, functional insufficiencies, the known and unknown hazardous scenario quadrants, and the operation phase evidence. Adopt it early even if you do not build vehicles, because there is no equivalent published framework written for robots.
Sources
What this record was verified against
- ISO, ISO 21448:2022 Road vehicles, Safety of the intended functionalityPrimary · 1 June 2022
Related
Records that sit beside this one
UL 4600 is the one published standard that asks an autonomous product for a safety case
Global · verified 15 September 2026
The UL Standards catalogue lists UL 4600, Standard for Evaluation of Autonomous Products, as active, edition 3, with a published date of 17 March 2023 and ANSI approval the same day.
Open question: how do you evidence a safety case for a controller that was learned rather than specified?
Global · verified 15 September 2026
ISO 13849-1 and IEC 62061 assume a specified safety function with quantifiable reliability in high or continuous demand mode.
The US regulates autonomous vehicles through exemptions and crash reporting, not through a self driving rule
United States · verified 15 September 2026
The notice summarises the framework's three principles and requests comment on interim guidance for commercial deployment exemptions, with comments requested on or before 31 August 2026.
Open question: who is liable when a behaviour the robot learned causes the harm?
Global · verified 15 September 2026
The AI Liability Directive proposal, which would have eased proof for exactly this case, was withdrawn and published as withdrawn in the Official Journal on 6 October 2025.
No published safety standard covers a legged humanoid, and the one that would is still a committee draft
Global · verified 15 September 2026
The ISO TC 299 catalogue lists ISO/CD 25785-1, Robotics, Safety requirements for dynamically stable industrial mobile robots, Part 1: Robots, at stage 30.60.
The AI management system standard is the one certificate a robot maker can actually hold today
Global · verified 15 September 2026
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is edition 1, published 2023-12, 51 pages, at stage 60.60, from ISO and IEC joint technical committee 1 subcommittee 42.
Cite this record
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0, with attribution. The record ID PAG-2026-0024 is permanent and is never reused.
- In a sentence
- According to the GAGE Physical AI Governance Atlas (as of 15 September 2026), the standard for harm with no broken part is sotif, written for road vehicles and borrowed by everyone else.
- APA
- GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). (2026). The standard for harm with no broken part is SOTIF, written for road vehicles and borrowed by everyone else. Physical AI Governance Atlas. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/records/PAG-2026-0024-global-iso-21448-sotif
- MLA
- "The standard for harm with no broken part is SOTIF, written for road vehicles and borrowed by everyone else." Physical AI Governance Atlas, GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education), 15 September 2026, https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/records/PAG-2026-0024-global-iso-21448-sotif.
- Chicago
- GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). "The standard for harm with no broken part is SOTIF, written for road vehicles and borrowed by everyone else." Physical AI Governance Atlas. Last modified 15 September 2026. https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/records/PAG-2026-0024-global-iso-21448-sotif.
- Permalink
- https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/records/PAG-2026-0024-global-iso-21448-sotif
Last updated . Every record re verified . The ledger is checked monthly, first Monday, and the same day for any new law or standard publication.
Back to the full ledger, or every record for Global and every standard record.
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.