Skip to main content

Jurisdiction

Global: Physical AI Governance Atlas

Global carries 12 records on the Physical AI Governance Atlas as of September 2026: 10 verified at a primary source, 0 reported, 0 announced with no document yet, 0 searched and absent, and 2 open questions. By kind: standard 10, open question 2.

Standard

10 records

Open question

2 records

Answers

What people ask about Global

What standard serves as evidence in Global?

No published safety standard covers a legged humanoid, and the one that would is still a committee draft (verified); The AI management system standard is the one certificate a robot maker can actually hold today (verified); IEEE 7007 is an ontology for ethically driven robotics, and it is the only active standard of its kind (verified); UL 4600 is the one published standard that asks an autonomous product for a safety case (verified); The standard for harm with no broken part is SOTIF, written for road vehicles and borrowed by everyone else (verified); Two functional safety standards decide whether a robot's stop is trustworthy, and both predate learned control (verified); Autonomous mobile robots in a warehouse are governed as driverless industrial trucks, by name (verified); The only safety standard written for robots that live with people is from 2014 and is marked for revision (verified); The collaborative robot document is a 2016 technical specification, and its replacement is still at proposal stage (verified); The world's industrial robot safety standard was reissued in 2025, in two parts, for the robot and for the cell (verified). Each record page quotes the document and says what it changes for a robot maker or a deployer.

What has nobody settled in Global?

Open question: how do you evidence a safety case for a controller that was learned rather than specified? (open question); Open question: who is liable when a behaviour the robot learned causes the harm? (open question). Each record page quotes the document and says what it changes for a robot maker or a deployer.

What has nobody settled in Global?

Open question: how do you evidence a safety case for a controller that was learned rather than specified?; Open question: who is liable when a behaviour the robot learned causes the harm?. The ledger poses these and does not answer them.

Every surface

Cut the ledger another way

By jurisdiction

By kind

Verdicts

Cite this page

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0, with attribution.

In a sentence
According to the GAGE Physical AI Governance Atlas (as of 15 September 2026), global on the physical ai governance atlas.
APA
GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). (2026). Global on the Physical AI Governance Atlas. Physical AI Governance Atlas. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/jurisdictions/global
MLA
"Global on the Physical AI Governance Atlas." Physical AI Governance Atlas, GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education), 15 September 2026, https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/jurisdictions/global.
Chicago
GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). "Global on the Physical AI Governance Atlas." Physical AI Governance Atlas. Last modified 15 September 2026. https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/jurisdictions/global.
Permalink
https://www.gage.academy/tools/physical-ai-governance-atlas/jurisdictions/global

Last updated . Every record re verified . The ledger is checked monthly, first Monday, and the same day for any new law or standard publication.

Back to the full ledger.

GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.

Powered by GAGE, free EU AI Act tools from the Global Academy of Generative-AI Education
CallEmailHelp