Open question: are two named people's percentages comparable when neither states a timeframe or a definition of catastrophe?
Rows on this ledger put 10 to 20 percent on AI takeover with many humans dead, 10 to 25 percent on things going badly, 70 percent on something like AIs taking over, and a median of 5 percent on extremely bad outcomes. The outcomes differ, the horizons are mostly unstated, and the 2023 survey found wording alone moves the share giving at least 10 percent from 38 to 51. Whether any two rows can be compared is not settled.
The verdict
Open question
No settled answer exists. The ledger poses the question, links the live debate, and does not answer it.
Key facts
What the sources say
- Record ID
- ODDS-2026-0022
- Kind
- Open question
- Jurisdiction
- Global
- Last verified
- Added
- Grace et al. 2023 report that between 38 and 51 percent of respondents gave at least 10 percent to outcomes as bad as extinction depending on the question asked, a framing effect inside one survey.
- Kokotajlo's 70 percent is for something like AIs taking over and, by his own clarification, not for extinction specifically (ODDS-2026-0015); Christiano's 10 to 20 is for takeover with many or most humans dead (ODDS-2026-0016).
- Amodei's 10 to 25 (ODDS-2026-0006) and Musk's 10 to 20 (ODDS-2026-0012) name no outcome more specific than things going badly and state no horizon.
- The International AI Safety Report 2026 describes likelihood, nature and timing as unusually ambiguous, which is a statement that the comparison itself lacks a settled basis (ODDS-2026-0003).
Dimension by dimension
3 dimensions, each one stated, silent or open
Timeframe named, Stated basis, Later revision. Stated means the document you can open below says it; silent means the ledger read the document and it does not.
- Timeframe namedOpen
- Stated in two rows (within the next decade; shortly after human level systems); absent in most
- Stated basisOpen
- One row shows arithmetic (ODDS-2026-0008); the surveys publish methods; the rest state none
- Later revisionOpen
- Open as of 2026-09-16
What it changes
For a reader deciding how much weight to give a number
Before giving weight to a difference between two numbers, check that they refer to the same outcome over the same horizon; on this ledger they usually do not, which is why it computes no average and ranks nobody. A reader who wants to compare should compare definitions first, and treat two numbers with different definitions as two different claims rather than as agreement or disagreement.
Sources
What this record was verified against
- Grace et al., Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI (arXiv 2401.02843)Primary · 5 January 2024
- International AI Safety Report 2026 (arXiv 2602.21012), page 76Primary · 24 February 2026
Related
Records that sit beside this one
Grace et al. 2023 survey of 2,778 AI authors: median 5 percent for extremely bad outcomes, October 2023
Global · verified 16 September 2026
The paper, Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI (arXiv 2401.02843), reports 2,778 responses from 18,459 working addresses, a 15 percent response rate, fielded 10 to 24 October 2023.
Daniel Kokotajlo: something like 70 percent that this goes horribly wrong, July 2026
United States · verified 16 September 2026
The Diary of a CEO episode page (Apple Podcasts listing), released 13 July 2026, describes Kokotajlo as a former OpenAI researcher and says he put the odds of catastrophe as high as 70 percent.
Paul Christiano: 10 to 20 percent chance of AI takeover with many or most humans dead, April 2023
United States · verified 16 September 2026
Fortune, 3 May 2023, by Tristan Bove, quotes Christiano on Bankless: I think maybe there is a 10 to 20 percent chance of AI takeover, with many, most humans dead.
Dario Amodei: 10 to 25 percent chance that things go badly, October 2023
United States · verified 16 September 2026
The Logan Bartlett Show's own page for episode 82 records: Dario gives a 75 to 90 percent chance that crazy tech will be built and everything will go fine, and works on reducing the 10 to 25 percent chance that disaster could occur.
Elon Musk: some chance, 10 to 20 percent, that it goes bad, October 2024
United States · verified 16 September 2026
Fortune, 30 October 2024, by Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez: Musk said there is this sub chance, that could be 10 to 20 percent, that it goes bad.
International AI Safety Report 2026: likelihood, nature and timing of loss of control unusually ambiguous, February 2026
Global · verified 16 September 2026
Page 76 of the report reads that a key challenge for policymakers is preparing for a risk whose likelihood, nature, and timing remains unusually ambiguous; the ledger read the sentence in the PDF at arXiv 2602.21012 and at the report's own site.
Cite this record
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0, with attribution. The record ID ODDS-2026-0022 is permanent and is never reused.
- In a sentence
- According to the GAGE Doom Number (as of 16 September 2026), open question: are two named people's percentages comparable when neither states a timeframe or a definition of catastrophe?.
- APA
- GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). (2026). Open question: are two named people's percentages comparable when neither states a timeframe or a definition of catastrophe?. Doom Number. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://www.gage.academy/tools/doom-number/records/ODDS-2026-0022-question-are-two-stated-percentages-comparable-without-timeframe-or-definition
- MLA
- "Open question: are two named people's percentages comparable when neither states a timeframe or a definition of catastrophe?." Doom Number, GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education), 16 September 2026, https://www.gage.academy/tools/doom-number/records/ODDS-2026-0022-question-are-two-stated-percentages-comparable-without-timeframe-or-definition.
- Chicago
- GAGE (Global Academy of Generative-AI Education). "Open question: are two named people's percentages comparable when neither states a timeframe or a definition of catastrophe?." Doom Number. Last modified 16 September 2026. https://www.gage.academy/tools/doom-number/records/ODDS-2026-0022-question-are-two-stated-percentages-comparable-without-timeframe-or-definition.
- Permalink
- https://www.gage.academy/tools/doom-number/records/ODDS-2026-0022-question-are-two-stated-percentages-comparable-without-timeframe-or-definition
Last updated . Every record re verified . The ledger is checked weekly, every Monday, and the same day a named person states a new figure in public.
Back to the full ledger, or every record for Global and every open question record.
GAGE briefings tell you which AI regulation deadlines are coming, what they actually require of you, and when a program opens.